This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2017. It is now read-only.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1.1k
private is a valid type when listing org repos#88
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The `private` type option appears to be valid, accepted and working forlisting an organization's private repositories, but it isn't documented
pengwynn added a commit that referenced this pull requestMay 25, 2012
`private` is a valid type when listing org repos
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
privatetype option appears to be valid, accepted and working for listing an organization's private repositories, but it isn't documented... this pull request adds it to the list of options.Thanks for your consideration,@pvdb