Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Package Declarations3#94

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

@knewbury01
Copy link
Collaborator

@knewbury01knewbury01 commentedSep 29, 2022
edited
Loading

Description

Decl3 package

Change request type

  • Release or process automation (GitHub workflows, internal scripts)
  • Internal documentation
  • External documentation
  • Query files (.ql,.qll,.qls or unit tests)
  • External scripts (analysis report or other code shipped as part of a release)

Rules with added or modified queries

  • No rules added
  • Queries have been added for the following rules:
    • RULE-5-3
    • RULE-5-5
    • RULE-5-6
    • RULE-5-7
    • RULE-8-1
  • Queries have been modified for the following rules:
    • rule number here

Release change checklist

A change note (development_handbook.md#change-notes) is required for any pull request which modifies:

  • The structure or layout of the release artifacts.
  • The evaluation performance (memory, execution time) of an existing query.
  • The results of an existing query in any circumstance.

If you are only adding new rule queries, a change note is not required.

Author: Is a change note required?

  • Yes
  • No

Reviewer: Confirm that either a change note is not required or the change note is required and has been added.

  • Confirmed

Query development review checklist

For PRs that add new queries or modify existing queries, the following checklist should be completed by both the author and reviewer:

Author

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with thestyle guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

Reviewer

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with thestyle guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

@knewbury01
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Notes RULE-5-6

  • not actually sure if the test1.c and test.h are needed, they are meant to cover the part of the rule that says multiple declarations are permitted if it arises from a declaration in a header file where the header is included multiple times. but that always still looks like one declaration to us I believe, so maybe not required to test?
mbaluda reacted with thumbs up emoji

@knewbury01
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Notes RULE-5-5

note that this rule uses the language "distinct" compared to "unique" (used in rules 5-6 and 5-7), which has affected my implementation with regards to full name matching vs 31 characters name matching

mbaluda reacted with thumbs up emoji

@knewbury01
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Notes RULE-8-1

not sure if the implementation note here should say what it currently does, or "This query does not check for implicitly typed parameters, typedefs or member declarations as this is information is not in the database."

mbaluda reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Contributor

@mbaludambaluda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I agree with your considerations regarding rules 5-5 5-6 and 8-1
The PR looks good to me

@knewbury01knewbury01 merged commitd39bdf4 intogithub:mainOct 7, 2022
@knewbury01knewbury01 self-assigned thisJan 5, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mbaludambaludambaluda approved these changes

Assignees

@knewbury01knewbury01

Labels

None yet

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@knewbury01@mbaluda

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp