Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Ruby: Diff-informed queries: phase 3 (non-trivial locations)#20080

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
d10c wants to merge1 commit intogithub:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromd10c:d10c/diff-informed-phase-3-ruby

Conversation

d10c
Copy link
Contributor

This PR enables diff-informed mode on queries that select a location other than dataflow source or sink. This entails adding a non-trivial location override that returns the locations that are actually selected.

Prior work includes PRs like#19663,#19759, and#19817. This PR uses the same patch script as those PRs to find candidate queries to convert to diff-enabled. This is the final step in mass-enabling diff-informed queries on all the languages.

Commit-by-commit reviewing is recommended.

  • I have split the commits that add/modify tests from the ones that enable/disable diff-informed queries.
  • If the commit modifies a .qll file, in the commit message I've included links to the queries that depend on that .qll for easier reviewing.
  • Feel free to delegate parts of the review to others who may be more specialized in certain languages.

@d10cd10c added the no-change-note-requiredThis PR does not need a change note labelJul 17, 2025
@d10cd10c marked this pull request as ready for reviewJuly 17, 2025 14:37
@CopilotCopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settingsJuly 17, 2025 14:37
@d10cd10c requested a review froma team as acode ownerJuly 17, 2025 14:37
Copy link
Contributor

@CopilotCopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for diff-informed queries in Ruby by implementing location overrides for queries that select non-trivial locations (not just dataflow sources or sinks). It's part of phase 3 of enabling diff-informed mode across all languages, completing the mass-enablement process.

Key changes:

  • AddsobserveDiffInformedIncrementalMode() predicate to disable diff-informed mode for specific queries where it's not suitable
  • Implements workaround for Ruby RegExp parsing issues when constants are folded

@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ private module MissingFullAnchorConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicateisSink(DataFlow::Nodesink){sinkinstanceofSink}

predicateisBarrier(DataFlow::Nodenode){nodeinstanceofSanitizer}

predicateobserveDiffInformedIncrementalMode(){
none()// can't be made diff-informed because the locations of Ruby RegExpTerms aren't correct when the regexp is parsed from a string arising from constant folding
Copy link
Preview

CopilotAIJul 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The comment should be more specific about what 'aren't correct' means. Consider clarifying whether the locations are missing, inaccurate, or point to the wrong source positions.

Suggested change
none()// can't be made diff-informed because the locations of Ruby RegExpTermsaren't correct when the regexp is parsed from a string arising from constant folding
none()// can't be made diff-informed because the locations of Ruby RegExpTermsare inaccurate or point to incorrect source positions when the regexp is parsed from a string arising from constant folding

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

@d10cd10c requested a review frommichaelnebelJuly 17, 2025 14:38
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilotCopilot left review comments

@michaelnebelmichaelnebelAwaiting requested review from michaelnebel

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
no-change-note-requiredThis PR does not need a change noteRuby
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
@d10c

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp