- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5.2k
More arities for tuple returning zip extension method#47147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
ghost commentedJan 19, 2021
Note regarding the This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change. |
ghost commentedJan 19, 2021
Tagging subscribers to this area:@eiriktsarpalis Issue DetailsCloses#43702 It grows exponentially for test exhaustiveness. I'm just focusing on the third parameter.
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
eiriktsarpalis left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Looks great, thank you for the contribution!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
| publicstaticMethodInfoZip_TFirst_TSecond_TThird_3(TypeTFirst,TypeTSecond,TypeTThird)=> | ||
| (s_Zip_TFirst_TSecond_TThird_3?? | ||
| (s_Zip_TFirst_TSecond_TThird_3=newFunc<IQueryable<object>,IEnumerable<object>,IEnumerable<object>,IQueryable<(object,object,object)>>(Queryable.Zip).GetMethodInfo().GetGenericMethodDefinition())) | ||
| .MakeGenericMethod(TFirst,TSecond,TThird); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I was going to comment saying??= could be used to simplify this, but I see you're just following the pattern used in a bunch of other cases above. We can clean it up later.
huoyaoyuan left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
PR feedbacks
Co-authored-by: Stephen Toub <stoub@microsoft.com>Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>
eiriktsarpalis commentedJan 19, 2021
Thanks for the contribution! |
Logerfo commentedJan 19, 2021
Thank you! In which runtime version is this feature supposed to be available? |
eiriktsarpalis commentedJan 19, 2021
That would be released with .NET 6 next November. |
Closes#43702
It grows exponentially for test exhaustiveness. I'm just focusing on the third parameter.