)# DescriptionThe `LibraryMode` test variant with `useWasmSdk: False, isPublish: True`is expected to fail, but the test was asserting success for allvariants.Updated test to set `ExpectSuccess: false` when publishing without WASMSDK, verifying the operation exits with code 1 as expected.```csharp// Publishing without WASM SDK is expected to failbool expectSuccess = useWasmSdk || !isPublish;if (isPublish)    PublishProject(info, config, new PublishOptions(AssertAppBundle: useWasmSdk, ExpectSuccess: expectSuccess));else    BuildProject(info, config, new BuildOptions(AssertAppBundle: useWasmSdk, ExpectSuccess: expectSuccess));```# Customer ImpactNo customer impact - test-only change.# RegressionNo. Test was incomplete, not validating the expected failure scenario.# TestingTest compiles successfully. The updated test will properly validate allfour variants:- Build without SDK: succeeds- Build with SDK: succeeds  - Publish with SDK: succeeds- Publish without SDK: **fails** (now correctly validated)# RiskMinimal - test-only change with no production code impact.<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->---✨ Let Copilot coding agent [set things up foryou](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/new?title=✨+Set+up+Copilot+instructions&body=Configure%20instructions%20for%20this%20repository%20as%20documented%20in%20%5BBest%20practices%20for%20Copilot%20coding%20agent%20in%20your%20repository%5D%28https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips%29%2E%0A%0A%3COnboard%20this%20repo%3E&assignees=copilot)— coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up foryour repo.---------Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>Co-authored-by: maraf <10020471+maraf@users.noreply.github.com>