Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[release/9.0] [mono] Revert "don't define HAS_CUSTOM_BLOCKS on mono (#106764)"#107675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot commentedSep 11, 2024
edited by matouskozak
Loading

Backport of#107558 to release/9.0

/cc@matouskozak

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

The#106801 caused significant improvements for MonoJIT but introduced unexpected regressions for MonoAOT/MonoInterpreter described at#107308 (comment). We decided that the safest approach for .NET 9 is to keep MonoJIT regressed and do not introduce new regressions to MonoAOT and MonoInterpreter.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Found using Performance measurements on dotnet/runtime main.

Testing

Revert of#106801, we expect to get to the state before the original commit.

Risk

Low: this is a revert of previous backport#106801.

@ghostghost added the area-System.Memory labelSep 11, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-memory
See info inarea-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@vitek-karasvitek-karas added the Servicing-considerIssue for next servicing release review labelSep 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

approved. please get a code review and this can be merged when ready

matouskozak reacted with thumbs up emoji
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release and removed Servicing-considerIssue for next servicing release review labelsSep 11, 2024
@matouskozak
Copy link
Member

cc:@carlossanlop it's ready to merge

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop merged commit593af2b intorelease/9.0Sep 12, 2024
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-107558-to-release/9.0 branchSeptember 12, 2024 20:07
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked and limited conversation to collaboratorsOct 13, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.

Reviewers

@EgorBoEgorBoEgorBo approved these changes

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT approved these changes

@vitek-karasvitek-karasvitek-karas approved these changes

@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-System.MemoryServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Milestone

9.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@matouskozak@EgorBo@jeffschwMSFT@vitek-karas@carlossanlop

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp