Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork4.3k
Add missing fields update implementations#25331
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:br41nslug/now-809
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
changeset-botbot commentedJun 20, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
|
ComfortablyCoding left a comment• edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Tests
- Expect sdk to accept
concurrentIndexCreation
on create collection query - Expect sdk to accept
concurrentIndexCreation
on create field. FAIL. No option is present - Expect sdk to accept
concurrentIndexCreation
on batch field update - Expect sdk to accept
concurrentIndexCreation
on field update - Expect batch update fields to be avaialable via an sdk method (
updateFields
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Fixes#25330
Builds on top of#25199
Scope
What's changed:
updateFields()
REST command to the SDKconcurrentIndexCreation
option in the SDKPotential Risks / Drawbacks
Review Notes / Questions