Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Update factorization.md [Update Powersmooth Definition]#1461

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
t0wbo2t wants to merge3 commits intocp-algorithms:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromt0wbo2t:patch-1

Conversation

t0wbo2t
Copy link

The definition of powersmooth was a bit confusing so I added a formal definition inspired by a number theory book.

The definition of powersmooth was a bit confusing so I added a formal definition inspired by a number theory book.
@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Member

Hi, thank you very much for the pull request!

I think one other issue here is that the article mistakenly applies the term "powersmooth" to$p$, while it should be applied to$p-1$ instead. Would it be okay for you to update this as well, so that it is consistent with the formal definition, and is clear enough what it refers to exactly?

On a side note, I think it's more common to put commas outside of$...$ expressions?

@t0wbo2t
Copy link
Author

t0wbo2t commentedMay 21, 2025
edited
Loading

Sure, done.

Commas are now outside $...$ and definiton is for (p - 1) for consistency.
@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Member

Thanks! But what I meant is, the article currently uses an incorrect definition of powersmooth, and your initial edit was correct. And I suggested to rewrite other parts of the article to make it clear that the powersmooth number is actually$p-1$, and not$p$.

t0wbo2t reacted with thumbs up emoji

Updated materials related to powersmoothness.Corrected some minor mistakes.
@t0wbo2t
Copy link
Author

I have changed materials to the best of my knowledge. Please let me know if there are any errors.

Copy link
Member

@adamant-pwnadamant-pwn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for the update! I added a few more change suggestions, hopefully after that situation about powersmooth numbers will be completely clarified.

@@ -189,11 +188,11 @@ Notice, if $p-1$ divides $M$ for all prime factors $p$ of $n$, then $\gcd(a^M -
In this case we don't receive a factor.
Therefore, we will try to perform the $\gcd$ multiple times, while we compute $M$.
Some composite numbers don't have $B$-powersmooth factors for small $B$.
Some composite numbers don't have $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth factors for small $\mathrm{B}$.
For example, the factors of the composite number $100~000~000~000~000~493 = 763~013 \cdot 131~059~365~961$ are $190~753$-powersmooth and $1~092~161~383$-powersmooth.
We will have to choose $B >= 190~753$ to factorize the number.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
We will have to choose $B>= 190~753$ to factorize the number.
We will have to choose $B\geq 190~753$ to factorize the number.

Comment on lines +191 to 192
Some composite numbers don't have $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth factors for small $\mathrm{B}$.
For example, the factors of the composite number $100~000~000~000~000~493 = 763~013 \cdot 131~059~365~961$ are $190~753$-powersmooth and $1~092~161~383$-powersmooth.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
Some composite numbers don't have$\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth factors for small $\mathrm{B}$.
For example,the factors ofthe composite number $100~000~000~000~000~493 = 763~013 \cdot 131~059~365~961$are $190~753$-powersmooth and $1~092~161~383$-powersmooth.
Some composite numbers don't havefactors $p$ s.t. $p-1$ is $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth for small $\mathrm{B}$.
For example,forthe composite number $100~000~000~000~000~493 = 763~013 \cdot 131~059~365~961$, values $p-1$are $190~753$-powersmooth and $1~092~161~383$-powersmooth correspondingly.

And thefactorsare $31$-powersmooth and $16$-powersmoothrespectably, because $1303 - 1 = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 31$ and $3697 - 1 = 2^4 \cdot 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 11$.
In 1974 John Pollard invented a method to extracts $B$-powersmooth factors from a composite number.
And thevalues, $1303 - 1$ and $3697 - 1$,are $31$-powersmooth and $16$-powersmoothrespectively, because $1303 - 1 = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 31$ and $3697 - 1 = 2^4 \cdot 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 11$.
In 1974 John Pollard invented a method to extracts $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth factors from a composite number.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
In 1974 John Pollard invented a method toextracts $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth factors from a composite number.
In 1974 John Pollard invented a method toextract factors $p$, s.t. $p-1$ is $\mathrm{B}$-powersmooth, from a composite number.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adamant-pwnadamant-pwnadamant-pwn requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@t0wbo2t@adamant-pwn

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp