You signed in with another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/geometry/nearest_points.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ An alternative method arises from a very simple idea to heuristically improve th
173
173
</div>
174
174
175
175
176
-
We will consider only the squares containing at least one point. Denote by $n_1, n_2, \dots, n_k$ the number of points in each of the $k$ remaining squares. Assuming at least two points are in the same or in adjacent squares, the time complexity is $\Theta(\sum_{i=1}^{k} n_i^2)$.
176
+
We will consider only the squares containing at least one point. Denote by $n_1, n_2, \dots, n_k$ the number of points in each of the $k$ remaining squares. Assuming at least two points are in the same or in adjacent squares, the time complexity is $\Theta\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^k n_i^2\right)$.
177
177
178
178
??? info "Proof"
179
179
For the $i$-th square containing $n_i$ points, the number of pairs inside is $\Theta(n_i^2)$. If the $i$-th square is adjacent to the $j$-th square, then we also perform $n_i n_j \le \max(n_i, n_j)^2 \le n_i^2 + n_j^2$ distance comparisons. Notice that each cube has at most $8$ adjacent cubes, so we can bound the sum of all comparisons by $\Theta(\sum_{i=1}^{k} n_i^2)$. $\quad \blacksquare$