Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.2k
-
Any idea when we're going to see a new version of the prowlarr script? Got a notice this morning from NZBfinder that the current version is no longer supported and will not be allowed access. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
what do you mean? we install the latest release from their github |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Well... apparently the Proxmox Scripts LXC updater isn't catching it - or I'm missing the point of whatthat script is supposed to do? I did the update 'manually' in the Prowlarr dashboard / control panel under 'settings', and it seems to have done the job. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Update function deletes the rm -rf /opt/Prowlarrfetch_and_deploy_gh_release"prowlarr""Prowlarr/Prowlarr""prebuild""latest""/opt/Prowlarr""Prowlarr.master*linux-core-x64.tar.gz"chmod 775 /opt/Prowlarr |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
Not sure what logs or something you want. I've been runningthis community script for on-demand updates of containers, and also havethe cron version supposedly running to do the same on a regular (weekly) basis. The LXC Updater ran through all the containers - including Prowlarr - showing zero updates available, immediately before I kicked off the update from 1.37.x to 2.05.x within Prowlarr itself. I'm getting the impression that the LXC updater scripts only update the container OS, not the actual app itself... which is kinda misleading. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Those scripts only update the OS, not the application. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
This script has been created to simplify and speed up the process of updating all LXC containers across various Linux distributions, such as Ubuntu, Debian, Devuan, Alpine Linux, CentOS-Rocky-Alma, Fedora, and ArchLinux. It's designed to automatically skip templates and specific containers during the update, enhancing its convenience and usability. The description clearly states its for updating the container, not the installed apps. I'm feeling like writing these script descriptions is becoming pointless because noone makes even the slightest effort to read them. Yes, the script updates the container OS, not the application. Every container has the |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
👍 2
-
Well, first off, thank you for clarifying that; it was clearly a misunderstanding on my part not a problem with any of the scripts. That said... I don't think it's a matter of not making "even the slightest effort to read" the description, because I definitelydid, several times, before I ever posted. My take away from reading that description - and having used the update script more than a few times - was that it would (and does) allow the user to skip updating specific containers. I've used that functionality in the past. The other bit, about 'templates'... was less clear, at least to me. When we're talking about install 'scripts' for various 'apps', it wasn't inherently obviousto me what 'templates' referred to. Thus I made some assumptions, and well... we know where that ended up ;)
Okay, that is excellent information that I was not aware of (obviously). Literally just now found where it shows up on the pop-up text on the 'updateable' button. A lot of my installs pre-date the newer version of the site, and I don'tthink that was there back then, so I probably didn't look at the pop-up text on that as closely as I should have. My bad. If I were going to offer one small constructive suggestion, maybe it would be appropriate to include in the updater script description something specific about using the Either way, thank you for the help on this. Now I know ;) |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I don't really blame you that much for not knowing this, hardly anyone reads our documentation. We specifically avoided making a mass application update scripts because it potentialy leads into us breaking loads of LXCs because very often application update leads to breaking change which we cant really know ahead of time. This could wreak havoc on peoples homelabs and we don't want that. We pretty much insist that you update manually, preferably running a backup/snapshot beforehand. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
