Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork304
feat: update default changelog titles#1143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:v5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
codecovbot commentedMay 24, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1143 +/- ##==========================================+ Coverage 97.33% 97.57% +0.24%========================================== Files 42 55 +13 Lines 2104 2603 +499 ==========================================+ Hits 2048 2540 +492- Misses 56 63 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| ConventionalCommitsCz, | ||
| "change_type_map", | ||
| { | ||
| "feat":"Feat", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Why are the tests using the old format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I did not want to change the tests. So I applied mocking instead to hard-coding the new values.
IMHO: For tests, the names should not matter, I guess. The point is what the values are actually used for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
It might be a bit confusing as these are no longer the actualdefault_change_type_map when someone's tracing the test cases, they might be misled
Lee-W commentedJul 11, 2024
@paduszyk Hi, would it be possible for us to address#1119 (comment). I think we're really close to merging! |
noirbizarre commentedAug 20, 2024
I would flag this change as breaking as it means any user having a custom |
Lee-W commentedAug 21, 2024
Sounds good! Let me add the label |
Lee-W left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I think we need to change the test cases
paduszyk commentedNov 6, 2025
It's been a while... Sorry. @Lee-W Are you sure? This will result in a relatively large diff, taking into account the source itself will remain basically untouched except the update literals... |
bearomorphism commentedDec 3, 2025
I agree that test cases should be updated, otherwise it will cause confusion to future contributors. I don't think relatively large diff on test files is an issue. |
Description
This updates the default titles of the changelog's sections in
ConventionalCommitsCz.Checklist
./scripts/formatand./scripts/testlocally to ensure this change passes linter check and testExpected behavior
Changelogs are more human-readable.
Additional context
Closes#1119.