Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix: Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 77: Uncontrolled data used in path expression#422

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
filipchristiansen wants to merge2 commits intomain
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromalert-autofix-77

Conversation

filipchristiansen
Copy link
Contributor

Potential fix forhttps://github.com/coderamp-labs/gitingest/security/code-scanning/77

To address this issue, the_parse_local_dir_path function needs to validate thepath_str input to ensure it stays within a predefined safe root directory.

  1. Validation Strategy:

    • Define a safe root directory (e.g.,TMP_BASE_PATH).
    • Normalize the path usingPath.resolve() and ensure the resulting path is a subpath of the safe root directory.
  2. Implementation:

    • Useos.path.commonpath to compare the normalized path to the safe root directory.
    • Raise an exception if the path escapes the root directory.
  3. Changes Required:

    • Modify_parse_local_dir_path insrc/gitingest/query_parser.py to include validation logic.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…in path expressionCo-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@filipchristiansenfilipchristiansen marked this pull request as ready for reviewJuly 15, 2025 21:38
Copy link
Contributor

@CopilotCopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses a security vulnerability (code scanning alert no. 77) by implementing path traversal protection in the_parse_local_dir_path function. The change prevents uncontrolled data from being used in path expressions by validating that user-provided paths remain within a safe root directory.

Key Changes:

  • Added path validation logic to prevent directory traversal attacks
  • Implemented safe root directory boundary checking usingos.path.commonpath
  • Added exception handling for paths that escape the allowed root directory

@@ -327,7 +327,10 @@ def _parse_local_dir_path(path_str: str) -> IngestionQuery:
A dictionary containing the parsed details of the file path.

"""
root_path = TMP_BASE_PATH.resolve()

This comment was marked as outdated.

Comment on lines 332 to 333
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
raise InvalidPatternError(f"Path {path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
Copy link
Preview

CopilotAIJul 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The path validation logic has a potential issue: os.path.commonpath() can raise ValueError if the paths are on different drives (Windows) or if the list is empty. Consider wrapping this in a try-except block and also verify that both paths exist before comparison.

Suggested change
ifos.path.commonpath([root_path,path_obj])!=str(root_path):
raiseInvalidPatternError(f"Path{path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
# Ensure both paths exist
ifnotroot_path.exists()ornotpath_obj.exists():
raiseInvalidPatternError(f"One or both paths do not exist:{root_path},{path_obj}")
# Check if path_obj is within root_path
try:
ifos.path.commonpath([root_path,path_obj])!=str(root_path):
raiseInvalidPatternError(f"Path{path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
exceptValueErrorase:
raiseInvalidPatternError(f"Invalid path comparison:{e}")

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

path_obj = Path(path_str).resolve()
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
Copy link
Preview

CopilotAIJul 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The comparison converts root_path to string but uses the Path object directly in the commonpath call. This could lead to inconsistent behavior. Consider using str(root_path) consistently or compare Path objects directly.

Suggested change
ifos.path.commonpath([root_path,path_obj])!=str(root_path):
ifos.path.commonpath([str(root_path),str(path_obj)])!=str(root_path):

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

@filipchristiansenfilipchristiansen changed the titlePotential fix for code scanning alert no. 77: Uncontrolled data used in path expressionfix: Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 77: Uncontrolled data used in path expressionJul 15, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilotCopilot left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
@filipchristiansen

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp