- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork3
Language tool files#33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
coderabbitaibot commentedJul 15, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
WalkthroughA new test file has been added to validate the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat withCodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on oursupport page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
languageTool.test.ts (1)
43-43:Remove type assertion for better type safety.The
as anytype assertion bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider properly typing the mock parameters or using a more specific type.-} as any+}If type errors occur, address them by properly typing the mock object or importing the correct types from the languageTool module.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
languageTool.test.ts(1 hunks)sample.txt(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
sample.txt
[grammar] ~5-~5: Possible subject-verb agreement error: Did you mean to use “is”?
Context: ...ntence have a agreement error. The list are long and detailed. He don't know what h...
(DT_NN_ARE_AME)
[grammar] ~7-~7: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... He don't know what he doing. Here is a mispeling. It is an very good idea to try this t...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sample.txt (1)
1-11:LGTM! Intentional errors serve the testing purpose well.The file contains appropriate intentional grammatical and spelling errors that will effectively test the
runLanguageToolfunction's ability to detect various language issues including subject-verb agreement, spelling mistakes, and article usage errors.
| runLanguageTool(mockParams).then(() => { | ||
| console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:", mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper error handling and test structure.
The test lacks error handling and doesn't follow standard testing patterns. Consider using a proper test framework with describe/it blocks and assertions.
-runLanguageTool(mockParams).then(() => {-console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:", mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs)-})+describe("runLanguageTool", () => {+it("should detect language errors in sample text", async () => {+try {+await runLanguageTool(mockParams)+const toolOutputs = mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs++// Add assertions here to verify expected behavior+expect(toolOutputs).toBeDefined()+expect(toolOutputs.languagetool).toBeDefined()++console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:", toolOutputs)+} catch (error) {+console.error("Test failed:", error)+throw error+}+})+})
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| runLanguageTool(mockParams).then(()=>{ | |
| console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:",mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs) | |
| }) | |
| describe("runLanguageTool",()=>{ | |
| it("should detect language errors in sample text",async()=>{ | |
| try{ | |
| awaitrunLanguageTool(mockParams) | |
| consttoolOutputs=mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs | |
| // Add assertions here to verify expected behavior | |
| expect(toolOutputs).toBeDefined() | |
| expect(toolOutputs.languagetool).toBeDefined() | |
| console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:",toolOutputs) | |
| }catch(error){ | |
| console.error("Test failed:",error) | |
| throwerror | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| }) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In languageTool.test.ts around lines 49 to 51, the test currently uses a simplepromise with console.log and lacks error handling and proper test structure.Refactor the test to use a testing framework like Jest or Mocha with describeand it blocks, include assertions to verify expected outcomes, and add errorhandling to catch and report any failures during the runLanguageTool execution.| env.LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME = "fakeUser" | ||
| env.LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY = "fakeKey" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid direct environment variable mutation in tests.
Directly mutating environment variables can cause issues in parallel test execution and doesn't clean up after the test. Consider using a mocking library or proper test setup/teardown.
-// Fake credentials for testing (you should replace these with valid test creds or mock the API)-env.LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME = "fakeUser"-env.LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY = "fakeKey"+// Mock environment variables for testing+const originalUsername = env.LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME+const originalApiKey = env.LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY++env.LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME = "fakeUser"+env.LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY = "fakeKey"
And add cleanup after the test:
runLanguageTool(mockParams).then(() => { console.log("Test complete. Tool outputs:", mockParams.fileHunks[0].toolOutputs)+// Restore original environment variables+env.LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME = originalUsername+env.LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY = originalApiKey })🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In languageTool.test.ts around lines 46 to 47, avoid directly mutatingenvironment variables as it can cause issues in parallel tests and lackscleanup. Instead, use a mocking library or test setup/teardown methods totemporarily set LANGUAGETOOL_USERNAME and LANGUAGETOOL_API_KEY for the test, andensure you restore or clean up these environment variables after the testcompletes.| import fs from "fs" | ||
| import { env } from "../../utils/env" | ||
| const fileContent = fs.readFileSync("sample.txt", "utf-8") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix the relative file path to be more robust.
The relative path"sample.txt" may fail if the test is executed from a different working directory. Consider using an absolute path or a path relative to the test file's location.
-const fileContent = fs.readFileSync("sample.txt", "utf-8")+import path from "path"+const fileContent = fs.readFileSync(path.join(__dirname, "sample.txt"), "utf-8")
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In languageTool.test.ts at line 5, the file path "sample.txt" is relative andmay break if the test runs from a different directory. Update the path to beabsolute or relative to the test file's location by using __dirname orpath.resolve to construct the file path, ensuring it correctly locates"sample.txt" regardless of the working directory.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Tooling found in:#33 (review)
Summary by CodeRabbit