You signed in with another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window.Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 16, 2025. It is now read-only.
@@ -40,6 +41,8 @@ We are witnessing an inflection point in the software development industry. Deve
40
41
41
42
While on the code generation side, many tools have emerged, the code review process has remained largely unchanged. We continue to use the same tools and processes that were used 10 years ago. The code is still manually reviewed, which is slow, error-prone, and expensive. To address this, we are building[CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai/), an AI-powered code reviewer that is part of the code merge and CI/CD process. With CodeRabbit our vision is to speed up the code merge process by an order of magnitude, while also improving the quality of the code that goes beyond what is possible with human reviewers alone and existing linting tools.
42
43
44
+
<!--truncate-->
45
+
43
46
##Impediments to shipping quality software@Speed
44
47
45
48
An average developer spends most of their time between writing and reviewing the code. Typically, the development process involves branching off from the main code base, developing a new feature or fixing a bug, and then merging the code back into the mainline. To write software, developers use modern editors such as Visual Studio Code which include sophisticated language servers, static analyzers and linters. These tools are being rapidly augmented by AI-powered extensions such as GitHub Copilot. Local development tools are just one part of the equation.
@@ -41,6 +42,8 @@ Introducing AI-powered code reviews! Picture your team's pull requests getting r
41
42
42
43
We'll discuss the regular stages of software projects and the impact of AI code reviewers like[CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai) in this digital era. You'll gain a detailed insight into how these tools are changing the game, making code reviews faster, smarter, and surprisingly, more human-like.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: blog/2023-11-13-boosting-engineering-efficiency.md
+8Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ title: Boosting Engineering Efficiency Using AI Code Reviews for Remote Teams
4
4
description:In a world where the office is just a step away from your bed, we dive into the challenges and triumphs of maintaining code quality across continents.
@@ -39,6 +40,13 @@ Welcome to the future, where morning commutes involve going from bed to home off
39
40
This setup presents a unique challenge: ensuring that code reviews, which are essential for code quality, are consistent, timely, and efficient. Have you ever missed a code review because it was late at night? We've all been there. Are you waiting for days to get feedback because your reviewer is in a different time zone? Oh, the frustration!
40
41
Introducing the helpful algorithm: AI-driven code reviews. They're like a reliable friend who never sleeps (because they're code) and knows all the coding rules. This article explores how these intelligent bots fill the gaps in our fast-paced, sometimes slow, new world.
41
42
43
+
```mdx-code-block
44
+
import Tabs from '@theme/Tabs';
45
+
import TabItem from '@theme/TabItem';
46
+
```
47
+
48
+
<!--truncate-->
49
+
42
50
##Direct Correlation: Remote Engineering Challenges & AI Solutions
43
51
44
52
Remember the good old days when you could easily ask a quick question to a colleague by just going to their desk? Those days are gone, just like floppy disks and dial-up internet. Nowadays, with remote work, we have traded cubicles for couches and water cooler chats for solo trips to the fridge. Let's address the three significant challenges of remote engineering and explore how AI's modern technology can provide a solution.