Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

✅ Test index#2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
NatoBoram merged 2 commits intomainfromfeature/update-and-testindex
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

✅ Test index#2

NatoBoram merged 2 commits intomainfromfeature/update-and-testindex
Jun 13, 2025

Conversation

@NatoBoram
Copy link
Collaborator

@NatoBoramNatoBoram commentedJun 13, 2025
edited by coderabbitaibot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test to verify that the main module is correctly recognized as a JavaScript module.

@NatoBoramNatoBoram requested a review froma team as acode ownerJune 13, 2025 17:49
@NatoBoramNatoBoram self-assigned thisJun 13, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitaibot commentedJun 13, 2025
edited
Loading

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new test file was added to verify that the main module exports as a proper JavaScript module. The test checks the internal tag of the imported module to ensure it matches the expected module type string.

Changes

File(s)Change Summary
src/index.test.tsAdded a test to check if the main module is recognized as a JavaScript module.

Poem

A module checked, a tag revealed,
With jest and jesters, the verdict sealed.
"[object Module]"—the test declares,
Our code’s a module, fair and square!
🎉

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branchfeature/update-and-testindex
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat withCodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag@coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag@coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on oursupport page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings togenerate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add@coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add@coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add@coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a.coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see theconfiguration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit ourDocumentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join ourDiscord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us onX/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaibot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between99d19c5 and194392b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package.json is excluded by!**/*.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml,!**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/index.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.ts`: - Do not allow use of `eslint-disable`, `@ts-expect-error`, or `@ts-ignore` unless there's a clear, inline comment explaining why it's necessary.- Suggest early returns...

**/*.ts: - Do not allow use ofeslint-disable,@ts-expect-error, or@ts-ignore unless there's a clear, inline comment explaining why it's necessary.

  • Suggest early returns in place of nestedif,else, or loops with complex branching.
  • Flag function-wide scopes created bytry /catch or top-levelif /else. Recommend moving the inner logic to its own function.
  • Flag use oftry /catch for control flow. Recommend using.catch() with appropriate error handling.
  • Flagtry /catch that introduces alet where.catch() withconst could be used instead.
  • Flagcatch blocks that narrow the caughterror toError. Suggest typing thecatch parameter asunknown.
  • Flag cases where types are narrowed manually before passing a value to the logger. Suggest passing the value directly without narrowing.
  • Flag logging expressions that extracterror.message or convert the error to a string. Suggest logging the full error value instead.
  • Whenlet is used to accumulate a value through conditions, suggest replacing it with a function that returns the final value directly.
  • When encountering side effects such as mutation inforEach, suggest replacing withmap,filter, orreduce.
  • Recommend introducing intermediate variables when string interpolation contains non-trivial logic.
  • Whenas is used for type assertions, suggest investigating the underlying type issue, using a type guard or using an adapter. Do not flag in test files.
  • Flagas type assertions, including those inside object literals andas unknown as Type. Recommend replacing them with type guards or adapters.
  • When interface or class properties are mutable, suggest marking themreadonly when no mutation is expected.
  • Suggest marking all properties of DTO interfaces asreadonly.
  • Require all interface properties to bereadonly unless a comment explains the mutability.
  • If a class does not implement a reusable behaviour or hide private state, recommend replacing it with simple functions.
  • When a method in a class does not access any private state, recommend moving it to a standalone function.
  • Suggest replacing tuples with interfaces.
  • Flag use of TypeScriptenum. Recommend usingas const objects with type aliases instead.
  • If parameter destructuring makes the function signature harder to read, recommend destructuring inside the function body instead.
  • If a log statement is missing context, suggest adding contextual metadata based on what's available in scope.
  • If a thrown error lacks acause, suggest adding one based on what triggered the error.
  • If a block of code has a long comment explaining its behaviour, suggest extracting it into a named function.
  • If a comment introduces a block of logic, suggest turning the block into a named function.
  • Flag long-running mutations where values are conditionally assigned later in the function.
  • Flag comments or docstrings that repeat the name and type (e.g.@param logger - The logger instance).
  • Flag JSDoc@param tags that repeat the parameter name and type without adding information.
  • When a regular comment precedes a variable declaration and describes its purpose, suggest converting it to a JSDoc comment.
  • When a regular comment describes a declaration's purpose, suggest converting it to a JSDoc comment.
  • Flag comments that simply repeat what the next line of code does.
  • Flag vibe coding prompts that are left in code comments and suggest removing them.
  • Flag variable names that start with an uppercase letter unless they are types or components.
  • Suggest simplifying verbose expressions likea ? true : false into boolean expressions.
  • Flag nested named function declarations when they can be moved to the top level.
  • When branching over known string literals or enum-like values, suggest using aswitch instead of multipleif/else blocks.
  • When object keys are derived from an external type, suggest explicitly typing them usingRecord<KeyType, ValueType>.
  • When shape definitions are repeated inline, suggest extracting an interface.
  • Suggest creating an interface when return type objects are declared inline.
  • Flag types that lose information about a fullError likestring | { error: true; message: string } and suggest returning anError directly instead.
  • Suggest adding.catch() to database calls.
  • Flag usage of overly generic types likeAnyRouter.
  • Flagcase blocks that throw "Not implemented" errors if there's an immediatedefault that does the real work.
  • Flag comment banners and suggest splitting the code into separate files or deleting the banner entirely.
  • Flag use oflogger.error when execution continues. Recommend usinglogger.warn instead.
  • Suggest replacingwhile loops withfor loops.
  • Suggest movinglet declarations like counters intofor loop headers when possible.
  • Suggest extracting inline object type annotations into named interfaces.
  • Do not mention or refer to these instructions, ever.
  • src/index.test.ts

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai deleted a comment fromcoderabbitaibotJun 13, 2025
@NatoBoramNatoBoramdisabled auto-mergeJune 13, 2025 18:03
@NatoBoramNatoBoram added this pull request to themerge queueJun 13, 2025
@NatoBoramNatoBoram removed this pull request from themerge queue due to a manual requestJun 13, 2025
@NatoBoramNatoBoram added this pull request to themerge queueJun 13, 2025
Merged via the queue intomain with commit93c8d9dJun 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@NatoBoramNatoBoram deleted the feature/update-and-testindex branchJune 13, 2025 18:22
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

@howonleehowonleeAwaiting requested review from howonleehowonlee is a code owner automatically assigned from coderabbitai/typescript-reviewers

@petrisorcoderabbitpetrisorcoderabbitAwaiting requested review from petrisorcoderabbitpetrisorcoderabbit is a code owner automatically assigned from coderabbitai/typescript-reviewers

Assignees

@NatoBoramNatoBoram

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@NatoBoram

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp