- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork928
feat(site): Read users into basic UsersTable#981
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
codecovbot commentedApr 12, 2022 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #981 +/- ##==========================================+ Coverage 66.62% 66.72% +0.10%========================================== Files 249 255 +6 Lines 14686 14915 +229 Branches 135 136 +1 ==========================================+ Hits 9784 9952 +168- Misses 3923 3964 +41- Partials 979 999 +20
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
This is great!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Approving with the suggestion and merge 🎉. I know it's listed as a merge conflict, but I ran it locally and it was a case of "yes I want both of these changes":
exportinterfacePager{total:number}exportinterfacePagedUsers{page:UserResponse[]pager:Pager}exportinterfaceWorkspaceAutostartRequest{schedule:string}exportinterfaceWorkspaceAutostopRequest{schedule:string}
I'm not sure why this is registering as a conflict, but I digress.
Awesome stuff!!
Co-authored-by: G r e y <grey@coder.com>
…o users-table/presleyp/592
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
AC:
The other columns and pagination will be done separately.