- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1.1k
chore: revert runner sizes & parallelism from #21091#21380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <danny@coder.com>
spikecurtis approved these changesDec 23, 2025
1127533 intomain 41 checks passed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
The juice wasn't worth the squeeze. We reduced our median run times by 33% but also increased the failure rate. Even if the latter is a misattribution to this change, doubling costs for only a 33% speedup is not worth it.
The refactorings from#21091 are worthwhile keeping, so I've just reverted the runner sizes & parallelism toprevious levels.
Before:
After: