It's unfortunate that this PR referencescoder/aibridge#31, since that contains no context.

coder/aibridge#20 is the parent issue, and it contains some more details. Perhaps you missed this one? I'm not sure why we structured the issue like this 😞

I don't think we should just simply capture the UA because 1) it may not be useful and 2) we'll need to aggregate by client at some point and doing so on an infinite set of possible UAs will be very difficult.

We should do the client detection in Bridge and pass through a known set of client names.

At the very least I think this needs a (mini) RFC to discuss how we do this detection and what we do if a new (or as yet unknown) client is used.