Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

ci: add workflow for agentic issue triage#19839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
johnstcn merged 23 commits intomainfromcj/hack/traiage
Sep 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

johnstcn
Copy link
Member

@johnstcnjohnstcn commentedSep 16, 2025
edited
Loading

Adds a GH workflow to start a workspace with a pre-determined template, perform a first pass over a given GitHub issue, and persist the changes in a GCS bucket for later refining. Tested locally withnektos/act.

Note: "traiage" is not a typo.

@johnstcnjohnstcn self-assigned thisSep 16, 2025
@johnstcnjohnstcn changed the title[WIP] add workflow for agentic issue triageci: add workflow for agentic issue triageSep 18, 2025
@johnstcnjohnstcn marked this pull request as ready for reviewSeptember 18, 2025 18:44
Copy link
Member

@mafredrimafredri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I haven't tested the scripts but looks good and fairly simple. Nice work!

echo "- **Context Key:** ${CONTEXT_KEY}";
echo "- **Workspace:** ${WORKSPACE_NAME}";
echo "- **Archive URL:** ${ARCHIVE_URL}"
} >> "${GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY}"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Could we also output here how to utilize the artifact?

PS. What's the difference of throwing it into step summary vs just outputting to stdout?

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY will let you emit markdown that's visible in the job execution log

ref:https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/supercharging-github-actions-with-job-summaries/

mafredri reacted with heart emoji
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Regarding the "how-to" -- I think we will want to add some level of automation around this in the associated template. Something like the below:

data "coder_parameter" "resume_context_key" {  name = "resume_context_key"  type = "string"  default = ""}locals {  archive_url = "gs://${var.gcp_bucket}/traiage/${context_key}"}resource "coder_script" "fetch_context" { ... }

mafredri reacted with thumbs up emoji
return
fi

OPENSSH_CONFIG_FILE="${TEMPDIR}/coder-ssh.config"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggestion: Could setCODER_SSH_CONFIG_FILE instead and avoid passing the flag, but perhaps the more explicit file access is warranted here considering how it's used.

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Yep, to the best of my knowledge a--flag will always override an environment variable, hence my usage of a flag instead.

johnstcnand others added3 commitsSeptember 19, 2025 17:05
Co-authored-by: Mathias Fredriksson <mafredri@gmail.com>
@aslilac
Copy link
Member

Note: "traiage" is not a typo.

thanks I hate it

@johnstcnjohnstcn merged commit1249683 intomainSep 22, 2025
51 of 53 checks passed
@johnstcnjohnstcn deleted the cj/hack/traiage branchSeptember 22, 2025 12:29
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked and limited conversation to collaboratorsSep 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@mafredrimafredrimafredri approved these changes

Assignees

@johnstcnjohnstcn

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
@johnstcn@aslilac@mafredri

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp