- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1k
docs: update Tailscale DERP fleet usage phrasing#19653
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Fine with the change as-is. Left a thought though; graciously felt out of place to me but I might be missing context so I'll leave it up to you.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: david-fraley <67079030+david-fraley@users.noreply.github.com>
2030907 intomainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
I noticed that our docs mention the possibility of using the Tailscale-managed DERP server fleet.#15901 changed the phrasing from
to
This change alters the original meaning of the sentence. AFAIK, the original meant that we contacted Tailscale directly and asked if it would be ok for our customers to use the Tailscale-managed DERP server fleet, and Tailscale graciously agreed. The new phrasing conveys something different. This PR reverts the phrasing to the original.