Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix: disallow lifecycle endpoints for prebuilt workspaces#19264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ssncferreira
Copy link
Contributor

@ssncferreirassncferreira commentedAug 8, 2025
edited
Loading

Description

This PR updates the API to prevent lifecycle configuration endpoints from being used on prebuilt workspaces. Since prebuilds are managed by the reconciliation loop and do not participate in the regular workspace lifecycle, they must not support per-workspace overrides for fields like deadline, TTL, autostart, or dormancy.

Attempting to use these endpoints on a prebuilt workspace will now return a clear validation error (409 Conflict) with an appropriate explanation. This prevents accidental misconfiguration and preserves the lifecycle separation between prebuilds and regular workspaces.

Changes

The following endpoints now return an error if the target workspace is a prebuild:

  • PUT /workspaces/{workspace}/extend
  • PUT /workspaces/{workspace}/ttl
  • PUT /workspaces/{workspace}/autostart
  • PUT /workspaces/{workspace}/dormant

Update endpoints logic to use the API clock in order to allow time mocking in tests.

Related with:

@ssncferreirassncferreira changed the titlefix(api): disallow lifecycle configuration for prebuilt workspacesfix: disallow lifecycle configuration for prebuilt workspacesAug 8, 2025
@ssncferreirassncferreira changed the titlefix: disallow lifecycle configuration for prebuilt workspacesfix: disallow lifecycle endpoints for prebuilt workspacesAug 8, 2025
// Prebuild lifecycle is managed by the reconciliation loop, with scheduling behavior
// defined per preset at the template level, not per workspace.
ifworkspace.IsPrebuild() {
httpapi.Write(ctx,rw,http.StatusConflict, codersdk.Response{
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

409 Conflict based on discussion:#19252 (comment)

ssncferreira added a commit that referenced this pull requestAug 13, 2025
## DescriptionThis PR ensures that prebuilt workspaces are properly excluded from thelifecycle executor and treated as a separate class of workspaces, fullymanaged by the prebuild reconciliation loop.It introduces two lifecycle guarantees:* When a prebuilt workspace is created (i.e., when the workspace buildcompletes), all lifecycle-related fields are unset, ensuring theworkspace does not participate in TTL, autostop, autostart, dormancy, orauto-deletion logic.* When a prebuilt workspace is claimed, it transitions into a regularuser workspace. At this point, all lifecycle fields are correctlypopulated according to template-level configurations, allowing theworkspace to be managed by the lifecycle executor as expected.## Changes* Prebuilt workspaces now have all lifecycle-relevant fields unsetduring creation* When a prebuild is claimed:* Lifecycle fields are set based on template and workspace levelconfigurations. This ensures a clean transition into the standardworkspace lifecycle flow.* Updated lifecycle-related SQL update queries to explicitly excludeprebuilt workspaces.## Relates Related issue:#18898To reduce the scope of this PR and make the review process moremanageable, the original implementation has been split into thefollowing focused PRs:*#19259*#19263*#19264*#19265These PRs should be considered in conjunction with this one tounderstand the complete set of lifecycle separation changes for prebuiltworkspaces.
}

// Use injected Clock to allow time mocking in tests
now:=api.Clock.Now()
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@ssncferreirassncferreiraAug 13, 2025
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

If I understand correctly, all timestamps in the database are stored in UTC.
Do we need to explicitly set this to UTC? I see it being done in other places, for instance, in settingnextStartAt:https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/main/coderd/workspaces.go#L574

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Generally it's recommended to usedbtime.Time as this also rounds to the microsecond which is the smallest unit of precision supported by Postgres.

But if you're just using it as an initial reference point I'd say it should be OK.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Yes, the pattern I have been following is using theClock.Now() on the application layer, anddtime.Time for database operations.

@ssncferreirassncferreira marked this pull request as ready for reviewAugust 13, 2025 16:56
}

// Use injected Clock to allow time mocking in tests
now:=api.Clock.Now()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Generally it's recommended to usedbtime.Time as this also rounds to the microsecond which is the smallest unit of precision supported by Postgres.

But if you're just using it as an initial reference point I'd say it should be OK.

@ssncferreirassncferreira merged commit734299d intomainAug 14, 2025
28 checks passed
@ssncferreirassncferreira deleted the ssncferreira/fix-api-prebuild-lifecycle-endpoints branchAugust 14, 2025 10:30
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked and limited conversation to collaboratorsAug 14, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@johnstcnjohnstcnjohnstcn approved these changes

@SasSwartSasSwartSasSwart approved these changes

@DanielleMaywoodDanielleMaywoodAwaiting requested review from DanielleMaywood

Assignees

@ssncferreirassncferreira

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
@ssncferreira@johnstcn@SasSwart

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp