- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1k
fix(site): add tests forcreateMockWebSocket
#19172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
publishOpen: (event: Event) => void; | ||
readonly isConnectionOpen: boolean; | ||
readonly clientSentData: readonly SocketSendData[]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
This was one part I was a little torn on, and I'd be open to alternative ways to track data sent from the mock socket to the mock server
It feels like the "boy scout" way of doing this would be with subscription callbacks, but since we'd likely just be checking the contents for a single isolated test case, that'd add more boilerplate to all test cases when we really just care about what data got sent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
totally seems good enough to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
these tests are really nice, thank you!
left a couple things for you to think about but overall looks great. really good job.
"http://www.dog.ceo/roll-over", | ||
"https://www.dog.ceo/roll-over", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
dog.ceo!!!
expect(onClose).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
expect(onClose).toHaveBeenCalledWith(closeEvent); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
this test makes me feel like I'm looking at a freshly ironed shirt. super nice!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
}); | ||
it("Only registers each socket event handler once", () => { | ||
const [socket, server] = createMockWebSocket("wss://www.dog.ceo/borf"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
borf!!!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
get clientSentData() { | ||
return [...sentData]; | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
cheeky little copy for immutability, nice.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
5225c56
intomainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Needed for#19126 and#18679
Changes made
createWebSocket
to dedicated file and addressed edge cases for making it a reliable mock