TBD: Do we classify this breaking or not? IMO it could slip by as not as random selection can't really be a feature, can it? And dev containers are new and you can just not use them.

IMO if you have to ask yourself if this is a breaking change, it's best to err on the side of caution and label it as breaking (obligatory:https://xkcd.com/1172/).

@mafredri my understanding of this change is as follows:

Given: workspace foo, agent smith, no sub-agents
Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent bar
• coder ssh foo.bar maps to agent bar

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, jones
Then:

• coder ssh foo fails
• coder ssh foo.smith maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.jones maps to agent jones

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, sub-agents johnson
Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.smith maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.johnson maps to agent johnson

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, sub-agents johnson, thompson
Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.smith maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.johnson maps to agent johnson
• coder ssh foo.thompson maps to agent thompson

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, johnes, sub-agents johnson, thompson
Then:

• coder ssh foo fails
• coder ssh foo.smith maps to agent smith
• coder ssh foo.jones maps to agent jones
• coder ssh foo.johnson maps to agent johnson
• coder ssh foo.thompson maps to agent thompson

Am I correct?

@johnstcn Close, just two correction (as sub agents are prioritized same as in the Web UI).

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, sub-agents johnson
Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent smithThis maps to johnson

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, sub-agents johnson, thompson
Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent smithThis errors, two sub agents

Given: workspace foo, agents smith, sub-agents johnson Then:

• coder ssh foo maps to agent smithThis maps to johnson

On the surface I find this mildly surprising, but given that it's predicated on the presence of a sub-agent and that it corresponds with the UI's prioritization, that seems fine to me.