- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1k
chore: add PGLocks query to analyze what locks are held in pg#15308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Emyrk merged 6 commits intostevenmasley/postgres_tx_serialfromstevenmasley/postgres_tx_serial_pg_locksNov 1, 2024
Merged
chore: add PGLocks query to analyze what locks are held in pg#15308
Emyrk merged 6 commits intostevenmasley/postgres_tx_serialfromstevenmasley/postgres_tx_serial_pg_locksNov 1, 2024
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Emyrk commentedOct 31, 2024
Comment on lines +50 to +57
case "relation": | ||
details = "" | ||
case "page": | ||
details = fmt.Sprintf("page=%d", *l.Page) | ||
case "tuple": | ||
details = fmt.Sprintf("page=%d tuple=%d", *l.Page, *l.Tuple) | ||
case "virtualxid": | ||
details = "waiting to acquire virtual tx id lock" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Will implement this as needed. Not going to be exhaustive here right now
spikecurtis approved these changesNov 1, 2024
3a9270d
intostevenmasley/postgres_tx_serial 26 checks passed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Adds
PGLocks
query similar to how we havePing()
. I cannot do this via SQLc, as SQLc does not know aboutpg_locks
table.The string format is able to be changed to extract more value. I recognize this is not perfect, but I wrote it trying to learn more about these locks. It felt valuable enough to keep. Not all values are handled correctly here, I'll add functionality as required.
Some example output
serializable
and runGetQuotaConsumedForUser()
UpdateWorkspaceBuildCostByID
in the TXSpecifically these are thenew locks aquired:
Used to respond here:#15261 (comment)