- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork928
docs: describe AWS hard NAT#13205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Merged
Changes fromall commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
50 changes: 50 additions & 0 deletionsdocs/networking/stun.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -122,3 +122,53 @@ originate. Using these internal addresses is much more likely to result in a | ||
successful direct connection. | ||
 | ||
## Hard NAT | ||
Some NATs are known to use a different port when forwarding requests to the STUN | ||
server and when forwarding probe packets to peers. In that case, the address a | ||
peer discovers over the STUN protocol will have the correct IP address, but the | ||
wrong port. Tailscale refers to this as "hard" NAT in | ||
[How NAT traversal works (tailscale.com)](https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works). | ||
If both peers are behind a "hard" NAT, direct connections may take longer to | ||
establish or will not be established at all. If one peer is behind a "hard" NAT | ||
and the other is running a firewall (including Windows Defender Firewall), the | ||
firewall may block direct connections. | ||
In both cases, peers fallback to DERP connections if they cannot establish a | ||
direct connection. | ||
If your workspaces are behind a "hard" NAT, you can: | ||
spikecurtis marked this conversation as resolved. Show resolvedHide resolvedUh oh!There was an error while loading.Please reload this page. | ||
1. Ensure clients are not also behind a "hard" NAT. You may have limited ability | ||
to control this if end users connect from their homes. | ||
2. Ensure firewalls on client devices (e.g. Windows Defender Firewall) have an | ||
inbound policy allowing all UDP ports either to the `coder` or `coder.exe` | ||
CLI binary, or from the IP addresses of your workspace NATs. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more. Maybe we should list where the binary is commonly found on each platform.
| ||
3. Reconfigure your workspace network's NAT connection to the public internet to | ||
be an "easy" NAT. See below for specific examples. | ||
### AWS NAT Gateway | ||
The | ||
[AWS NAT Gateway](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-nat-gateway.html) | ||
is a known "hard" NAT. You can use a | ||
[NAT Instance](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/VPC_NAT_Instance.html) | ||
instead of a NAT Gateway, and configure it to use the same port assignment for | ||
all UDP traffic from a particular source IP:port combination (Tailscale calls | ||
this "easy" NAT). Linux `MASQUERADE` rules work well for this. | ||
### AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) | ||
The default configuration of AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) includes the | ||
[Amazon VPC CNI Driver](https://github.com/aws/amazon-vpc-cni-k8s), which by | ||
default randomizes the public port for different outgoing UDP connections. This | ||
makes it act as a "hard" NAT, even if the EKS nodes are on a public subnet (and | ||
thus do not need to use the AWS NAT Gateway to reach the Internet). | ||
This behavior can be disabled by setting the environment variable | ||
`AWS_VPC_K8S_CNI_RANDOMIZESNAT=none` in the `aws-node` DaemonSet. Note, however, | ||
if your nodes are on a private subnet, they will still need NAT to reach the | ||
public Internet, meaning that issues with the | ||
[AWS NAT Gateway](#aws-nat-gateway) might affect you. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.