Nice! I'll take a look at this soon when I get a chance.

I did some quick tests and it seems to not deal with alpha correctly, at least for resizing.

I'll look into this at the next week, aglo probably needs more tweaking and that alpha issue

@brendan-duncan fixed alpha issue and made some performance adjustments, I'm very pleased with downscaling results as of now

Awesome, I'll check it out soon. Thanks!

I'm refactoring code right now, is resize.dart even used anywhere beside tests? Its part of src (internal files), but I cant see any references to resize function of itself.

resize.dart was a request to be able to do in-place resizing of images, as apposed to copyResize which always makes a copy, and is an exported function.

Thanks for reply, missed the export sorry.

I've tried to iterate on algo to fix it for upscaling, but no luck. If you're good with this particular implementation of interpolation being good for downscaling but bad for upscaling I probably should update docs for it and add explicit note.

I lack proper knowledge about image processing, so I think I leave this version for now, maybe in future when I'll have some more time I'll try to dig deeper about convolution filters and fix this implementation.
For future I think it should be implemented similar to this:https://github.com/richgel999/imageresampler/blob/master/resampler.cpp
Its the easiest to understand resampler implementation I've found so far.

Also some related links:
https://clouard.users.greyc.fr/Pantheon/experiments/rescaling/index-en.html
https://entropymine.com/imageworsener/
https://github.com/pixelflinger/lanczos-2d/tree/main
http://www.ericbrasseur.org/gamma.html

I'm not forgetting about this, just been busy with the family

No worries about that!

I've also found some issues with downscaling very big images to a very small, such as 1024->64, alpha looks inverted for some reason.

Can't give any dates, due to work, but I plan on changing this to a different approach - make a new file and implement convolution based scaling as in links I mentioned, so I think you can ignore pr this for a while.