Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork476
Throw on negative values when usingOverflow::Reject inTemporal.PlainTime.with#4490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Test262 conformance changes
Fixed tests (21): |
jedel1043 commentedOct 25, 2025
Why not upstream this to |
HalidOdat commentedOct 25, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
The issue is that I’d be interested to hear what@nekevss thinks as well? 😄 |
nekevss commentedOct 26, 2025
Seeboa-dev/temporal#432 andboa-dev/temporal#334. So yes, the issue has been known and preferably this behavior should be upstream in It is pretty niche behavior, so I've delayed adding it. My goal is to ultimately land something in temporal_rs before 1.0. |
jedel1043 left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Makes sense. I don't have any other suggestions then. We can remove this if/when we change the behaviour intemporal_rs.
59a7566Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This PR fixes the last failing test on the
Temporal.PlainTimetest suite (throws-if-time-is-invalid-when-overflow-is-reject.js).