Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Added a PEP 561py.typed marker#687

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
Avasam wants to merge1 commit intoauth0:master
base:master
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromAvasam:patch-1
Draft

Conversation

Avasam
Copy link

@AvasamAvasam commentedApr 10, 2025
edited
Loading

Changes

Added aPEP 561py.typed marker. Letting type checkers know that this package is typed. (this will also start the 6-months deprecation period ofhttps://pypi.org/project/types-auth0-python/ )

References

Closes#612

Testing

Check that the produced wheel / artefact includes apy.typed file. Simply running a local install and looking at yoursite-packages should do the trick.

  • [N/A] This change adds unit test coverage
  • [N/A] This change adds integration test coverage
  • This change has been tested on the latest version of the platform/language or why not

image

Checklist

Signed-off-by: Avasam <samuel.06@hotmail.com>
@AvasamAvasam requested a review froma team as acode ownerApril 10, 2025 21:00
@AvasamAvasam changed the titleAdd a PEP 561py.typed markerAdded a PEP 561py.typed markerApr 10, 2025
@Avasam
Copy link
Author

Avasam commentedApr 12, 2025
edited
Loading

I just saw#521 and#615
See my note in#678 (comment)

@AvasamAvasam marked this pull request as draftApril 12, 2025 02:56
@kishore7snehil
Copy link
Contributor

@Avasam Are we good to pull this change or is it still work in progress?

@Avasam
Copy link
Author

I do believe this is incorrect without#615 (I just wasn't aware of the full context back when I openned this)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Re-support - py.typed filed in the module
2 participants
@Avasam@kishore7snehil

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp