Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

build: update to TypeScript 5.9 beta#30740

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
crisbeto wants to merge1 commit intoangular:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromcrisbeto:ts-5.9-beta

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

Updates the repo to the TypeScript 5.9 beta and widens the peer dependency ranges.

@crisbetocrisbeto added the target: minorThis PR is targeted for the next minor release labelJul 18, 2025
@angular-robotangular-robotbot added the area: build & ciRelated the build and CI infrastructure of the project labelJul 18, 2025
@crisbetocrisbetoforce-pushed thets-5.9-beta branch 7 times, most recently from425da03 tocf0806cCompareJuly 18, 2025 09:00
Updates the repo to the TypeScript 5.9 beta and widens the peer dependency ranges.
@@ -149,12 +149,12 @@ describeBuilder(buildApplication, APPLICATION_BUILDER_INFO, (harness) => {
[
async () => {
// Add invalid block syntax
await harness.appendToFile('src/app/app.component.html', '@one');
await harness.appendToFile('src/app/app.component.html', '@if-one');
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I had to change this test, because in the latest version Angular is a bit more permissive about parsing unsupported blocks.

@crisbetocrisbeto added the action: reviewThe PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer labelJul 18, 2025
@crisbetocrisbeto marked this pull request as ready for reviewJuly 18, 2025 13:03
@@ -38,11 +38,15 @@ export function subscribeToWorkflow(
);
break;
case'update':
logs.push(`${colors.cyan('UPDATE')}${eventPath} (${event.content.length} bytes)`);
logs.push(
`${colors.cyan('UPDATE')}${eventPath} (${(event.contentasunknownasBuffer).length} bytes)`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This does not seem ideal from a type safety perspective.
Is there some information/context on the changes needed here?

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

So as far as I could tell, the types didn't really change but TS is being better at enforcing them. I did start to update the types, but it ended up spanning a ton of files so decided to keep the change simple for now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Ok. makes sense.
Can you add some TODOs in there so we can clean this up later on?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clydinclydinclydin approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
action: reviewThe PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewerarea: build & ciRelated the build and CI infrastructure of the projecttarget: minorThis PR is targeted for the next minor release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@crisbeto@clydin

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp