rustix's `rustix::fs::Dir` iterator with the `linux_raw` backend can cause memory explosion
Package
Affected versions
Patched versions
Description
Summary
When usingrustix::fs::Dir
using thelinux_raw
backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-allocation issue inrustix::fs::Dir::read_more
, this can cause quick and unbounded memory explosion (gigabytes in a few seconds if used on a hot path) and eventually lead to an OOM crash of the application.
Details
Discovery
The symptoms were initially discovered inimsnif/bandwhich#284. That post has lots of details of our investigation. Seethis post and theDiscord thread for details.
Diagnosis
This issue is caused by the combination of two independent bugs:
- Stuck iterator
- The
rustix::fs::Dir
iterator can fail to halt after encountering an IO error, causing the caller to be stuck in an infinite loop.
- Memory over-allocation
Dir::read_more
incorrectly grows the read buffer unconditionally each time it is called, regardless of necessity.
Since<Dir as Iterator>::next
callsDir::read
, which in turn callsDir::read_more
, this means an IO error encountered during reading a directory can lead to rapid and unbounded growth of memory use.
PoC
fnmain() ->Result<(),Box<dyn std::error::Error>>{// create a directory, get a FD to it, then unlink the directory but keep the FD std::fs::create_dir("tmp_dir")?;let dir_fd = rustix::fs::openat( rustix::fs::CWD, rustix::cstr!("tmp_dir"), rustix::fs::OFlags::RDONLY | rustix::fs::OFlags::CLOEXEC, rustix::fs::Mode::empty(),)?; std::fs::remove_dir("tmp_dir")?;// iterator gets stuck in infinite loop and memory explodes rustix::fs::Dir::read_from(dir_fd)?// the iterator keeps returning `Some(Err(_))`, but never halts by returning `None`// therefore if the implementation ignores the error (or otherwise continues// after seeing the error instead of breaking), the loop will not halt.filter_map(|dirent_maybe_error| dirent_maybe_error.ok()).for_each(|dirent|{// your happy pathprintln!("{dirent:?}");});Ok(())}
Impact
If a program tries to access a directory with its file descriptor after the file has been unlinked (or any other action that leaves theDir
iterator in the stuck state), and the implementation does not break after seeing an error, it can cause a memory explosion.
As an example, Linux's various virtual file systems (e.g./proc
,/sys
) can contain directories that spontaneously pop in and out of existence. Attempting to iterate over them usingrustix::fs::Dir
directly or indirectly (e.g. with theprocfs
crate) can trigger this fault condition if the implementation decides to continue on errors.
An attacker knowledgeable about the implementation details of a vulnerable target can therefore try to trigger this fault condition via any one or a combination of several available APIs. If successful, the application host will quickly run out of memory, after which the application will likely be terminated by an OOM killer, leading to denial of service.
References
- GHSA-c827-hfw6-qwvm
- imsnif/bandwhich#284
- imsnif/bandwhich#284 (comment)
- bytecodealliance/rustix@31fd98c
- bytecodealliance/rustix@87481a9
- bytecodealliance/rustix@df3c3a1
- bytecodealliance/rustix@eecece4
- https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/1161137828395237556
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43806
Severity
CVSS v3 base metrics
EPSS score
Weaknesses
WeaknessCWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.Learn more on MITRE.CVE ID
GHSA ID
Source code
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.