Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fixed misleading parameter variable names of ReverseMap methods.#24266

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
ejohnson-dotnet wants to merge2 commits intoabpframework:dev
base:dev
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromejohnson-dotnet:dev

Conversation

@ejohnson-dotnet
Copy link
Contributor

The ReverseMap methods will map the destination type back to the source type, but the "source" object will be of type TDestination. In other words, the "TDestination source" object is copied to the "TSource destination" object.

Description

Resolves#24265

This fixes the misleading parameter names to make clear which is the source object and which is the destination object.

This file already has the parameter names correctly implemented.
modules/identityserver/src/Volo.Abp.IdentityServer.Domain/Volo/Abp/IdentityServer/IdentityServerMapperlyMappers.cs

Checklist

  • I fully tested it as developer / designer and created unit / integration tests
  • I documented it (or no need to document or I will create a separate documentation issue)

How to test it?

Please describe how this can be tested by the test engineers if it is not already explicit - or remove this section if no need to description.

The ReverseMap methods will map the destination type back to the source type, but the "source" object will be of type TDestination.   In other words, the "TDestination source" object is copied to the "TSource destination" object.
@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedNov 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.06%. Comparing base (f759691) to head (1b87bc8).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@##              dev   #24266      +/-   ##==========================================- Coverage   51.07%   51.06%   -0.01%==========================================  Files        3288     3288                Lines      107052   107061       +9       Branches     8221     8223       +2     ==========================================- Hits        54677    54675       -2- Misses      50692    50701       +9- Partials     1683     1685       +2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report?Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@malimingmaliming self-requested a reviewNovember 25, 2025 00:46
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@malimingmalimingAwaiting requested review from maliming

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The ReverseMap parameter names are misleading

1 participant

@ejohnson-dotnet

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp