Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5.7k
docs: improve the PR template#1213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I'd prefer it if we could simplify the PR template rather than complicating it further…
What do you suggest/think we should do? |
Perhaps get rid of the checklist? It adds no value for reviewers; it should be "private" to the PR author. |
00648bc
tof78f8d6
CompareThis issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Describe your change
Checklist
UserProfile.js
is allowed butuserprofile.js
,Userprofile.js
,user-Profile.js
, anduserProfile.js
are not.Closes: #{$ISSUE_NO}
to this PR.