Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Test format#1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
youknowone wants to merge2 commits intoRustPython:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromyouknowone:test-format
Open

Conversation

@youknowone
Copy link
Member

@youknowoneyouknowone commentedNov 25, 2025
edited by coderabbitaibot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Internal code formatting improvements for enhanced maintainability and readability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitaibot commentedNov 25, 2025
edited
Loading

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@youknowone has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait7 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the@coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see ourFAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and betweenbf1cd24 andbb62766.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Formatting adjustments applied tocrates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs, including closure line breaks inand_then processing and reflowing match arms forConversionFlag variants. No functional or behavioral changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)Change Summary
Formatting refactor
crates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs
Reformatted closure withinand_then chain from single-line to multi-line layout; reflowedConversionFlag match arms for readability

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • No logic or control-flow changes—pure cosmetic reformatting
  • Verify formatting consistency aligns with project standards

Poem

A rabbit hops through lines of code so neat,
Adjusting breaks and spaces, oh how sweet!
The match arms flow like clover in the breeze,
No logic changed—just formatting to please! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check nameStatusExplanationResolution
Docstring Coverage⚠️ WarningDocstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.You can run@coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check❓ InconclusiveThe title 'Test format' is vague and does not clearly convey the actual changes made (formatting adjustments in Rust code).Consider using a more descriptive title that reflects the actual changes, such as 'Format Rust code in stdlib/ast/other.rs' or 'Reformat Option/Result chain and match arms'.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

Thanks for usingCodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment@coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaibot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
crates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs (1)

20-25:Consider formatting consistency in match arms.

The match arms on lines 20-23 are reflowed across multiple lines while lines 24-25 remain on single lines. For consistency, consider applying the same formatting style to all arms, or verify this aligns with your project's rustfmt configuration.

Example consistent formatting (all on single lines):

.map(|flag|match flag{    bytecode::ConversionFlag::None =>Self::None,    bytecode::ConversionFlag::Str =>Self::Str,    bytecode::ConversionFlag::Ascii =>Self::Ascii,    bytecode::ConversionFlag::Repr =>Self::Repr,})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between592bce6 andbf1cd24.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
crates/vm/src/stdlib/ast/other.rs (1)

17-18:Approve formatting adjustment to.and_then() call.

The closure formatting change improves readability by breaking the chain across lines. No functional impact.

@github-actions
Copy link

Code has been automatically formatted

The code in this PR has been formatted usingcargo fmt --all.
Please pull the latest changes before pushing again:

git pull origin test-format

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@youknowone

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp