Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

ruff forExpr parsing#6207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
ShaharNaveh wants to merge1 commit intoRustPython:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromShaharNaveh:revert-6206-revert-6124-ruff-unparse

Conversation

@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Collaborator

Reverts#6206

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the.coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the@coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting thereviews.review_status tofalse in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for usingCodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment@coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

)
returnscope

@unittest.expectedFailure# TODO: RUSTPYTHON; 'a,' != '(a,)'
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

@ShaharNavehShaharNavehOct 22, 2025
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@youknowone should I open a feature request to ruff team about this? or should we just maintain our own fork of it? I am less in favor of maintaining a fork as it will require us:

  1. maintain a fork
  2. prevents us from publishing a new version to crates.io (unless we push the fork to crates.io)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

make a fork, write a feature but ask to merge it before using the fork. split the fork later when rejected. nothing to loose.
because we (and most of open source projects) always don't have enough engineering power for the project, upstreaming is the better choice when possible.

ShaharNaveh reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Let's hope that they are fine with thisastral-sh/ruff#21041

@ShaharNavehShaharNaveh changed the titleruf forExpr uu parsingruf forExpr parsingOct 22, 2025
@ShaharNavehShaharNaveh changed the titleruf forExpr parsingruff forExpr parsingOct 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@youknowoneyouknowoneyouknowone left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ShaharNaveh@youknowone

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp