Issue

Fixes#7259

When sidewalks and cycleways are mapped as separate ways in OSM, they often lack aname tag. This results in unhelpful
navigation instructions like "Turn right, walk 150 m" instead of "Turn right onto Main Street, walk 150 m".

This PR adds support for fallback name tags that OSM mappers use to associate sidewalks with their adjacent streets:

• is_sidepath:of:name (~15,500 uses in OSM)
• street:name (~9,100 uses in OSM)

The fallback only applies when:

1. The way has noname tag
2. The highway type isfootway,cycleway, orpath
3. The way is marked as a sidepath viafootway=sidewalk,cycleway=sidepath, oris_sidepath=yes

Car routing is unaffected because the fallback requires the highway type to befootway,cycleway, orpath. Even if
someone mistakenly addsfootway=sidewalk to ahighway=primary, the fallback will not trigger since it checks the
highway type first.

Tests added

Foot profile (features/foot/sidepath_names.feature):

• Useis_sidepath:of:name for unnamed sidewalk
• Usestreet:name for unnamed sidewalk
• is_sidepath:of:name takes priority overstreet:name
• Explicitname tag takes priority over fallback
• Useis_sidepath=yes withstreet:name
• No fallback without sidepath marker

Bicycle profile (features/bicycle/sidepath_names.feature):

• Useis_sidepath:of:name for cycleway sidepath
• Usestreet:name for cycleway sidepath
• Explicit name takes priority
• Useis_sidepath=yes withis_sidepath:of:name
• No fallback without sidepath marker

Car profile (features/car/sidepath_names.feature):

• Does not use sidepath name fallback on roads
• Does not pick upis_sidepath:of:name on roads
• Sidepath markers do not affect car roads

Tasklist

• CHANGELOG.md entry (How to write a changelog entry)
• update relevantWiki pages (added "Way names" section to docs/profiles.md)
• add tests (seetesting documentation)
• review
• adjust for comments

Requirements / Relations

None