Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fix MA0053: Make class sealed inSystem.Management.Automation#21150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Closed
xtqqczze wants to merge5 commits intoPowerShell:masterfromxtqqczze:MA0053

Conversation

xtqqczze
Copy link
Contributor

  • dotnet format analyzers --diagnostics MA0053 --include src/System.Management.Automation/
  • Various manual fixes as a result of code fix.

https://github.com/meziantou/Meziantou.Analyzer/blob/main/docs/Rules/MA0053.md

Contributes to#15110.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecatedPull Request Quantifier (deprecated)

This PR has1208 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra LargeSize       : +633 -575Percentile : 100%Total files changed: 197Change summary by file extension:.cs : +633 -575

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on thePullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using thecontext generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out theExcluded section from yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you,see context specification to customize yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added:+1 -0
  • One line was deleted:+0 -1
  • One line was modified:+1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful?👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecatedPull Request Quantifier (deprecated)

This PR has1216 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra LargeSize       : +637 -579Percentile : 100%Total files changed: 198Change summary by file extension:.cs : +633 -575.csv : +4 -4

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on thePullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using thecontext generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out theExcluded section from yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you,see context specification to customize yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added:+1 -0
  • One line was deleted:+0 -1
  • One line was modified:+1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful?👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator

@xtqqczze It is too large PR. Please remove unrelated changes.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecatedPull Request Quantifier (deprecated)

This PR has1218 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra LargeSize       : +638 -580Percentile : 100%Total files changed: 198Change summary by file extension:.cs : +633 -575.csv : +5 -5

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on thePullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using thecontext generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out theExcluded section from yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you,see context specification to customize yourprquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added:+1 -0
  • One line was deleted:+0 -1
  • One line was modified:+1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful?👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@xtqqczze
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Changes fromsrc/System.Management.Automation/engine/remoting/client/RemotingProtocol2.cs split to#21164.

@microsoft-github-policy-servicemicrosoft-github-policy-servicebot added the Review - NeededThe PR is being reviewed labelFeb 8, 2024
@xtqqczzextqqczze marked this pull request as draftFebruary 13, 2024 20:28
@microsoft-github-policy-servicemicrosoft-github-policy-servicebot added the Waiting on AuthorThe PR was reviewed and requires changes or comments from the author before being accept labelFeb 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anmenagaanmenagaAwaiting requested review from anmenaga

@daxian-dbwdaxian-dbwAwaiting requested review from daxian-dbwdaxian-dbw is a code owner

@adityapatwardhanadityapatwardhanAwaiting requested review from adityapatwardhanadityapatwardhan is a code owner

@TravisEz13TravisEz13Awaiting requested review from TravisEz13TravisEz13 is a code owner

@SteveL-MSFTSteveL-MSFTAwaiting requested review from SteveL-MSFT

@SeeminglyScienceSeeminglyScienceAwaiting requested review from SeeminglyScienceSeeminglyScience will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for reviewSeeminglyScience is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Extra LargeReview - NeededThe PR is being reviewedWaiting on AuthorThe PR was reviewed and requires changes or comments from the author before being accept
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@xtqqczze@iSazonov

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp