Hi@yihong0618,

Thank you for your contribution. I have one idea about the login experience, please let me know your thoughts on this:

We still have only one entry(command) for the login, but when users trigger the command, a drop down list pops up, having the following options:

• LeetCode Account
• LeetCode Cookie
• Third-Party: GitHub
• Third-Party: LinkedIn

By doing this, the shortcut in the explorer would be applied to all kinds of login methods. And users won't need to remember different login commands. (Imagine that we might support more 3rd-party login in the future).

BTW, the CLI with the 3rd-party login has been released, you can update the CLI to2.6.20 in this PR.

@jdneo
You are right I also thinked of that, can I work on it this weekend and update the code?

Sure, thank you!

@jdneo vscode-leetcode 2.6.20 not found ~

My bad! It should be available right now!

@jdneo
Thank you for your review, the naming problems had changed, and please note that it is not support for leetcode-cn.com for GitHub and LinkedIn login in leetcode-cli 2.6.20 and I raised a commit in thispr to support it.

2.6.21 has been published to npm

@jdneo

2.6.21 has been published to npm

Try again, two-factor seems can not support in our way in vscode-leetcode, because maybe the async to sync way in request is using read fs but in vscode terminal doesn't support. I will try to figure out another if i could. Thank you.

Can you just note users that we are not support two-factor in vscode-leetcode for now, if they want they can use cli to login first.
Thank you very much.

Thanks@yihong0618, let me also take a look first.

Thanks@yihong0618, let me also take a look first.

Thank you, that would be wonderful.

FYI
I am wrong that is zsh problem.

If I comment this line

if(!pwd){childProc.kill();returnresolve(undefined);}childProc.stdin.write(`${pwd}\n`);// childProc.stdin.end();

vscode side can receive the "two-factor" message from cli side.
But I have problem with how to use thevscode.window.showInputBox with theondata

Sorry my laptop broke down last weekend and I have to send it to the store for repairment. I will try to resolve this PR in this week.

@yihong0618

You can write something like this:

childProc.stdout.on("data",async(data:string|Buffer)=>{data=data.toString();leetCodeChannel.append(data);if(data.includes("two-factor")){consttwoFactor:string|undefined=awaitvscode.window.showInputBox({prompt:"Enter two-factor code.",validateInput:(s:string):string|undefined=>s&&s.trim() ?undefined :"The input must not be empty",});if(!twoFactor){childProc.kill();returnresolve(undefined);}childProc.stdin.write(`${twoFactor}\n`);}else{constmatch:RegExpMatchArray|null=data.match(/(?:.*)Successfully(login|cookielogin|thirdpartylogin)as(.*)/i);if(match&&match[2]){returnresolve(match[2]);}}});

But I found that there is some problems in the CLI side.

1. prompt-sync is declared in thedevDependencies, which means the module will be missing in the extension side
2. Why not usingprompt butprompt-sync?

@yihong0618

You can write something like this:

childProc.stdout.on("data",async(data:string|Buffer)=>{data=data.toString();leetCodeChannel.append(data);if(data.includes("two-factor")){consttwoFactor:string|undefined=awaitvscode.window.showInputBox({prompt:"Enter two-factor code.",validateInput:(s:string):string|undefined=>s&&s.trim() ?undefined :"The input must not be empty",});if(!twoFactor){childProc.kill();returnresolve(undefined);}childProc.stdin.write(`${twoFactor}\n`);}else{constmatch:RegExpMatchArray|null=data.match(/(?:.*)Successfully(login|cookielogin|thirdpartylogin)as(.*)/i);if(match&&match[2]){returnresolve(match[2]);}}});

But I found that there is some problems in the CLI side.

1. prompt-sync is declared in thedevDependencies, which means the module will be missing in the extension side
2. Why not usingprompt butprompt-sync?

Because all request with session are in callback，and prompt must in the sync way. Otherwide it will fall through。
2. I will try tonight thank you
3. I also found that~ will also fix

@jdneo
Sorry, maybe I missed somthing, it didn't work on my win10 with this way.

@yihong0618, not quite get your point. Every async can should be able to change to sync from my understanding.

You can simply change it to:

if(resp.request.uri.href!==urls.github_tf_redirect){returnrequestLeetcodeAndSave(_request,leetcodeUrl,user,cb);}prompt.colors=false;prompt.message='';prompt.start();prompt.get([{name:'code',required:true}],function(e,result){if(e)returnlog.fail(e);constauthenticityTokenTwoFactor=body.match(/name="authenticity_token"value="(.*?)"/);if(authenticityTokenTwoFactor===null){returncb('Get GitHub two-factor token failed');}constoptionsTwoFactor={url:urls.github_tf_session_request,method:'POST',headers:{'Content-Type':'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',},followAllRedirects:true,form:{'otp':result.code,'authenticity_token':authenticityTokenTwoFactor[1],'utf8':encodeURIComponent('✓'),},};_request(optionsTwoFactor,function(e,resp,body){if(resp.request.uri.href===urls.github_tf_session_request){returncb('Invalid two-factor code please check');}requestLeetcodeAndSave(_request,leetcodeUrl,user,cb);});});

Theprompt-sync is too buggy. I'm not in favor of using that module.

By using the above code, then you can update the extension side, with following two callbacks change:

childProc.stdout.on("data",async(data:string|Buffer)=>{data=data.toString();leetCodeChannel.append(data);if(data.includes("twoFactorCode")){consttwoFactor:string|undefined=awaitvscode.window.showInputBox({prompt:"Enter two-factor code.",validateInput:(s:string):string|undefined=>s&&s.trim() ?undefined :"The input must not be empty",});if(!twoFactor){childProc.kill();returnresolve(undefined);}childProc.stdin.write(`${twoFactor}\n`);childProc.stdin.end();}else{constmatch:RegExpMatchArray|null=data.match(/(?:.*)Successfully.*loginas(.*)/i);if(match&&match[1]){childProc.stdin.end();returnresolve(match[1]);}}});

&

childProc.on("close",(code:number)=>{if(code!==0){reject(newError("Failed to login.`"));}});

@jdneo
You are right. Because I put the GitHub login without two-factor in the end of the code block, so it would fall through using prompt. And I think you are right. Really learned a lot from your project and the JS(TS), thank you. I will fix these tonight.

@yihong0618 No worry, I should thank you for all of the contributions you have made.

Will take a look at the PR recently.