Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

chore(modelarmor): Added floor settings tests#10106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
mihirvala-crestdata wants to merge4 commits intoGoogleCloudPlatform:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
frommihirvala-crestdata:model-armor-floor-settings-tests

Conversation

mihirvala-crestdata
Copy link

@mihirvala-crestdatamihirvala-crestdata commentedJun 13, 2025
edited
Loading

Description

Added Floor settings tests in model armor as issue b/424365799 is fixed.

Checklist

  • I have followedSample Format Guide
  • pom.xml parent set to latestshared-configuration
  • Appropriate changes to README are included in PR
  • These samples need a newAPI enabled in testing projects to pass (let us know which ones)
  • These samples need a new/updatedenv vars in testing projects set to pass (let us know which ones)
  • Tests pass:mvn clean verifyrequired
  • Lint passes:mvn -P lint checkstyle:checkrequired
  • Static Analysis:mvn -P lint clean compile pmd:cpd-check spotbugs:checkadvisory only
  • This sample adds a new sample directory, and I updated theCODEOWNERS file with the codeowners for this sample
  • This sample adds a newProduct API, and I updated theBlunderbuss issue/PR auto-assigner with the codeowners for this sample
  • Pleasemerge this PR for me once it is approved

@product-auto-labelproduct-auto-labelbot added api: modelarmorIssues related to the Model Armor API. samplesIssues that are directly related to samples. labelsJun 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assistgemini-code-assistbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello@mihirvala-crestdata, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces new integration tests for the Model Armor Floor Settings API across different resource levels (Project, Folder, Organization). The tests are currently disabled using@Ignore because of a known issue with the API they interact with. The code includes placeholders for environment variable checks and cleanup that will be enabled once the API is functional.

Highlights

  • New Floor Settings Tests: I've added new integration tests for the Model Armor Floor Settings API, coveringGet andUpdate operations.
  • Resource Hierarchy Coverage: The new tests are designed to verify Floor Settings at the Project, Folder, and Organization levels.
  • Tests Marked as Ignored: All newly added Floor Setting tests are currently marked with@Ignore due to an ongoing issue with the underlying API (referenced by buganizer ticket b/424365799).
  • Setup/Teardown Logic Added: I've included commented-out code inbeforeAll andafterAll to handle environment variable requirements and potentially reset floor settings, which should be uncommented once the API issue is resolved.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on ourdocumentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either/gemini <command> or@gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

FeatureCommandDescription
Code Review/gemini reviewPerforms a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary/gemini summaryProvides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment@gemini-code-assistResponds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help/gemini helpDisplays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a.gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be foundhere.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on@gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with theGemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review thePrivacy Notices,Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy,Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHubhere. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it anduse code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assistgemini-code-assistbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces new integration tests for floor settings in Model Armor. The tests cover getting and updating floor settings for projects, folders, and organizations.

Key changes include:

  • Addition of new test methods, currently marked with@Ignore due to an ongoing API issue (b/424365799).
  • Configuration forFOLDER_ID andORGANIZATION_ID via environment variables.
  • Implementation of aresetFloorSettings method in@AfterClass to clean up test resources, which is good practice, though currently commented out along with the tests.

The changes are well-structured and the intent to add comprehensive tests is clear. The use ofTODO comments to track the pending API fix is appropriate. A few minor stylistic suggestions regarding blank lines have been made.

@mihirvala-crestdatamihirvala-crestdataforce-pushed themodel-armor-floor-settings-tests branch from31549ab toa438abfCompareJuly 3, 2025 08:36
@mihirvala-crestdatamihirvala-crestdata changed the titlechore(modelarmor): Added floor settings tests and marked them as ignore/skipchore(modelarmor): Added floor settings testsJul 4, 2025
@utsav1810utsav1810 added kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelsJul 7, 2025
@kokoro-teamkokoro-team removed kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelsJul 7, 2025
// Tests for Folder setting snippets.
@Test
public void testGetOrganizationFloorSetting() throws IOException {
GetOrganizationFloorSetting.getOrganizationFloorSetting(ORGANIZATION_ID);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Can we have assertions for the actual value that was fetched by thegetOrganizationFloorSetting method? Similarly for other tests.

Copy link
Author

@mihirvala-crestdatamihirvala-crestdataJul 8, 2025
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

We followed a similar pattern to other snippet tests (seeSecret Manager tests). The goal of these tests is to verify that the snippets run successfully by asserting the presence of a success log.

@harshnasitcrest
Copy link
Contributor

NOTE: Please set following environment variables required for running tests:
MA_FOLDER_ID:695279264361
MA_ORG_ID:951890214235

@glasntglasnt requested a review froma team as acode ownerJuly 10, 2025 21:56
@glasntglasnt added the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 10, 2025
@kokoro-teamkokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 10, 2025
@glasntglasnt added the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 16, 2025
@kokoro-teamkokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 16, 2025
@glasnt
Copy link
Contributor

IAM settings should have been changed for this project, but the tests are still failing. Further investigation required.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gemini-code-assistgemini-code-assist[bot]gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

@bhardwaj-prernabhardwaj-prernabhardwaj-prerna left review comments

@yoshi-approveryoshi-approverAwaiting requested review from yoshi-approveryoshi-approver is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@utsav1810utsav1810

Labels
api: modelarmorIssues related to the Model Armor API.samplesIssues that are directly related to samples.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
@mihirvala-crestdata@harshnasitcrest@glasnt@bhardwaj-prerna@utsav1810@kokoro-team

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp