- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.9k
fix: sets ServiceAccountTests in IAM package to Ignore#10042
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Hello@telpirion, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses issue#10041 by temporarily disabling theServiceAccountTests.java file in theiam package. The tests are marked with@Ignore annotations, each referencing the issue number. This allows the IAM team to refactor the tests without causing build failures.
Highlights
- Test Disabling: The primary change is the addition of
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotations to all test methods withinServiceAccountTests.java. - Issue Resolution: This PR is a temporary fix to address issue#10041, allowing for further refactoring of the test file.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- iam/snippets/src/test/java/ServiceAccountTests.java
- Added
@Ignoreannotation to the class imports. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage1_testServiceAccountCreatetest method on line 81. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage1_testServiceAccountsListtest method on line 93. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountRenametest method on line 103. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountGettest method on line 115. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountKeyCreatetest method on line 125. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountKeyGettest method on line 135. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountKeysListtest method on line 147. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountKeyDisabletest method on line 157. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage2_testServiceAccountKeyEnabletest method on line 169. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage3_testServiceAccountKeyDeletetest method on line 181. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage4_testDisableServiceAccounttest method on line 195. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage5_testEnableServiceAccounttest method on line 207. - Added
@Ignore("issue #10041")annotation tostage6_testServiceAccountDeletetest method on line 219.
- Added
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on ourdocumentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either/gemini <command> or@gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review | Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary | Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help | Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a.gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be foundhere.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on@gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with theGemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Trivia time!
What is JUnit and what is it used for?
Click here for the answer
JUnit is a unit testing framework for Java. It is used for writing and running repeatable automated tests. It's an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
Footnotes
Review thePrivacy Notices,Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy,Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHubhere. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it anduse code with caution.↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses issue#10041 by adding the@Ignore annotation to the test methods inServiceAccountTests.java. This effectively disables the tests, which is a temporary solution until the IAM team refactors the file. The changes are straightforward and achieve the stated goal.
Merge Readiness
The pull request implements a temporary fix by disabling the failing tests. While this allows the build to pass, it's crucial that the IAM team addresses the underlying issue and refactors theServiceAccountTests.java file as soon as possible. I am unable to approve this pull request, and other reviewers should review and approve this code before merging. Merging this pull request is acceptable as a temporary measure, but should be followed up with a proper fix.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage1_testServiceAccountCreate() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage1_testServiceAccountCreate()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage1_testServiceAccountsList() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage1_testServiceAccountsList()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage2_testServiceAccountRename() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage2_testServiceAccountRename()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage2_testServiceAccountGet() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage2_testServiceAccountGet()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage2_testServiceAccountKeyCreate() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage2_testServiceAccountKeyCreate()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage2_testServiceAccountKeyEnable() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage2_testServiceAccountKeyEnable()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage3_testServiceAccountKeyDelete() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage3_testServiceAccountKeyDelete()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage4_testDisableServiceAccount() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage4_testDisableServiceAccount()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage5_testEnableServiceAccount() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage5_testEnableServiceAccount()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void stage6_testServiceAccountDelete() throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why these tests are being ignored, in addition to the issue number. This provides more context for future developers who might encounter this code. For example, you could state that the tests are temporarily disabled due to flakiness or incorrect behavior and will be re-enabled after refactoring.
| @Ignore("issue #10041") | |
| @Test | |
| publicvoidstage6_testServiceAccountDelete()throwsIOException { | |
| @Ignore("issue #10041: Temporarily disabled due to flakiness. Re-enable after refactoring.") | |
| @Test |
minherz left a comment• edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Two suggestions:
- Change the message to smth proposed by gemini-code-assistant or to "TODO: remove after resolving#10041"
- Consider ignoring the whole class instead. It looks like the issue should be resolved prior to adding new test cases or partially enabling tests. ignoring the whole class reduces overhead of re-enabling all tests.
Feel free to resolve suggestions that were auto-generated by gemini-code-assist.
Description
Addresses#10041
Someone from the IAM team needs to refactor the ServiceAccountTests.java file.