- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork839
Refactor Consumer Group to use Client#947
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
5b9359c to52863f0Compare
achille-roussel left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
We discussed the PR during our team meeting today and agreed on making the following changes:
- base the change on the 0.4 branch since it contains minor modifications to the exported APIs (removed an unused field + change fields from
int32tointtypes) - explore passing a parent context to the methods of the
coordinatorinterface - add the
AllowAutoTopicCreationfield to the top levelMetadataRequesttype so we don't need to bypass the abstraction layers
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
e72f2bd to74ce616Compare74ce616 to306b660Compare
achille-roussel left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
This is looking ready to merge in my opinion 🙌
moolitayer commentedOct 30, 2022
Thank you for working on this awsome library! Recently we've seen an issue on upgrading from v0.4.35 to v0.4.36. The issue went away after downgrad: Do you think it might be ralted to this change? Should I create an issue for it with our env details + code? |
rhansen2 commentedOct 30, 2022
Could be related. Please open an issue and we'll take a look, thanks! |
jhartzell commentedNov 1, 2022
Also seeing the same issue under a Strimzi cluster |
rhansen2 commentedNov 2, 2022
@moolitayer or@jhartzell Are either of you able to create an issue with a reproduction of the issues you're seeing? |
rhansen2 commentedNov 2, 2022
@moolitayer@jhartzell Thanks! |
This reverts commitee37c7f.
No description provided.