Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Human Gene Module/ Chromosome 10 /TCF7L2

TCF7L2Transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box)

SFARI Gene Score
1
High ConfidenceCriteria 1.1
Autism Reports / Total Reports
10 / 14
Rare Variants / Common Variants
37 / 0
EAGLE Score
2.1
LimitedLearn More
Aliases
TCF7L2, RP11-357H24.1,  TCF-4,  TCF4
Associated Syndromes
-
Chromosome Band
10q25.2-q25.3
Associated Disorders
DD/NDD, ADHD, ID, ASD
Genetic Category
Rare Single Gene Mutation, Syndromic, Functional
Relevance to Autism

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768). TADA analysis of de novo variants from the Simons Simplex Collection and the Autism Sequencing Consortium and protein-truncating variants from iPSYCH in Satterstrom et al., 2020 identified TCF7L2 as a candidate gene with a false discovery rate (FDR) between 0.01 and 0.05 (0.01 < FDR 0.05). Dias et al., 2021 reported 11 individuals with de novo TCF7L2 variants presenting with a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder; autism spectrum disorder was reported in four of these individuals.

Molecular Function

This gene encodes a high mobility group (HMG) box-containing transcription factor that plays a key role in the Wnt signaling pathway. The protein has been implicated in blood glucose homeostasis. Genetic variants of this gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (Diabetes mellitus, non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) [MIM:125853]).

External Links
Gene CardPubMed
Human
Entrez GeneOMIMUniProtHumanBaseVariCarta
Mouse
Entrez GeneMouse Genome InformaticsAllen Brain Atlas
SFARI Genomic Platforms
GPF browser
Reports related to TCF7L2 (14 Reports)
#TypeTitleAuthor, YearAutism ReportAssociated Disorders
1PrimaryThe contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorderIossifov I et al. (2014)Yes-
2SupportLarge-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disordersDeciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014)No-
3SupportMeta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disabilityLelieveld SH et al. (2016)No-
4SupportPrevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders et al. (2017)No-
5SupportInherited and multiple de novo mutations in autism/developmental delay risk genes suggest a multifactorial modelGuo H , et al. (2018)Yes-
6SupportLarge-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of AutismSatterstrom FK et al. (2020)Yes-
7SupportLarge-scale targeted sequencing identifies risk genes for neurodevelopmental disordersWang T et al. (2020)YesDD, ID
8Recent Recommendation-Dias C et al. (2021)NoASD, ADHD, ID
9Support-Woodbury-Smith M et al. (2022)Yes-
10Recent Recommendation-Qi H et al. (2023)Yes-
11Support-Wang J et al. (2023)Yes-
12Support-Tuncay IO et al. (2023)Yes-
13Support-Lukasz Mateusz Szewczyk et al. (2024)Yes-
14Support-Siavash Fazel Darbandi et al. ()Yes-
Rare Variants (37)
StatusAllele ChangeResidue ChangeVariant TypeInheritance PatternParental TransmissionFamily TypePubMed IDAuthor, Year
c.1219C>Tp.Arg407Terstop_gainedDe novo--28135719 et al. (2017)
c.1319-636G>A-missense_variantDe novo--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.451-1G>C-splice_site_variantDe novo--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.881C>Tp.Pro294Leumissense_variantDe novo--28135719 et al. (2017)
c.1144C>Tp.Gln382Terstop_gainedDe novo--34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.490G>Ap.Gly164Argmissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.526C>Tp.Arg176Trpmissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.836C>Tp.Pro279Leumissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.866C>Tp.Ser289Phemissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1097C>Ap.Ala366Glumissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1211G>Ap.Arg404Glnmissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1243C>Gp.Pro415Alamissense_variantDe novo--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1412G>Tp.Arg471Leumissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1643C>Ap.Ser548Tyrmissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1694C>Ap.Ser565Tyrmissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1763C>Tp.Ser588Leumissense_variantUnknown--33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.1143C>Gp.Asn381Lysmissense_variantDe novo--34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.1268A>Gp.Tyr423Cysmissense_variantDe novo--34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.553-1G>A-splice_site_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.875+1G>C-splice_site_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.1269T>Gp.Tyr423Terstop_gainedDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.685+1G>A-splice_site_variantDe novo-Simplex25363768Iossifov I et al. (2014)
c.1001+1G>A-splice_site_variantDe novo-Simplex25363768Iossifov I et al. (2014)
c.971C>Tp.Ser324Phemissense_variantUnknown-Simplex33004838Wang T et al. (2020)
c.595C>Gp.Pro199Alamissense_variantDe novo-Simplex37393044Wang J et al. (2023)
c.1143C>Gp.Asn381Lysmissense_variantDe novo--27479843Lelieveld SH et al. (2016)
c.1427A>Gp.Glu476Glymissense_variantDe novo--27479843Lelieveld SH et al. (2016)
c.1142A>Cp.Asn381Thrmissense_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.1250G>Tp.Trp417Leumissense_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.1267T>Cp.Tyr423Hismissense_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.552+49423C>T-intron_variantDe novo-Simplex31981491Satterstrom FK et al. (2020)
c.787delp.Gln263SerfsTer22frameshift_variantDe novo--34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.666C>Tp.Ala222=synonymous_variantUnknown--35205252Woodbury-Smith M et al. (2022)
c.1804G>Tp.Glu602Terstop_gainedFamilialPaternalSimplex30564305Guo H , et al. (2018)
c.536C>Ap.Ser179Termissense_variantFamilialBoth parents-37492102Tuncay IO et al. (2023)
c.660dupp.Pro221ThrfsTer107frameshift_variantDe novo-Simplex34003604Dias C et al. (2021)
c.1219C>Tp.Arg407Terstop_gainedDe novo-Unknown25533962Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014)
Common Variants 

No common variants reported.

SFARI Gene score
1

High Confidence

Score Delta: Score remained at1

1

High Confidence

See all Category 1 Genes

We considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.

4/1/2022
2
icon
1

Decreased from2 to1

4/1/2021
2
icon
2

Decreased from2 to2

Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

10/1/2020
2
icon
2

Decreased from2 to2

Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

1/1/2020
2
icon
2

Decreased from2 to2

Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

10/1/2019
3
icon
2

Decreased from3 to2

New Scoring Scheme
Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

1/1/2019
3
icon
3

Decreased from3 to3

Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

10/1/2014
icon
3

Increased from to3

Description

Two de novo LoF variants in the TCF7L2 gene (both splice-site) were identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection (PMID 25363768).

Krishnan Probability Score

Score0.49128103738989

Ranking5670/25841 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
Krishnan and colleagues generated probability scores genome-wide by using a machine learningapproach on a human brain-specific gene network. The method was first presented in NatNeurosci 19, 1454-1462 (2016), and scores for more than 25,000 RefSeq genes can be accessedin column G of supplementary table 3 (see:http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v19/n11/extref/nn.4353-S5.xlsx). A searchable browser,with the ability to view networks of associated ASD risk genes, can be found atasd.princeton.edu.
ExAC Score

Score0.98960502908944

Ranking1818/18225 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) is a summary database of 60,706 exomes that hasbeen widely used to estimate 'constraint' on mutation for individual genes. It was introduced byLek et al. Nature 536, 285-291 (2016), and the ExAC browser can be found atexac.broadinstitute.org. The pLI score was developed as measure of intolerance to loss-of-function mutation. A pLI > 0.9 is generally viewed as highly constrained, and thus any loss-of-function mutations in autism in such a gene would be more likely to confer risk. For a full list ofpLI scores see:ftp://ftp.broadinstitute.org/pub/ExAC_release/release0.3.1/functional_gene_constraint/fordist_cleaned_exac_nonTCGA_z_pli_rec_null_data.txt
Sanders TADA Score

Score0.0013288470924657

Ranking20/18665 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The TADA score ('Transmission and De novo Association') was introduced by He et al. PLoS Genet 9(8):e1003671 (2013),and is a statistic that integrates evidence from both de novo and transmitted mutations.It forms the basis for the claim of 65 individual genes being strongly associated with autism risk at a false discovery rate of 0.1 (Sanders et al. Neuron 87, 1215-1233(2015)). The calculated TADA score for 18,665 RefSeq genes can be found in column P of Supplementary Table 6 in the Sanders et al. paper(the column headed 'tadaFdrAscSscExomeSscAgpSmallDel'), which represents a combined analysis of exome data and small de novo deletions (see www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2038545319/2052606711/mmc7.xlsx).
Larsen Cumulative Evidence Score

Score12

Ranking164/461 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
Larsen and colleagues generated gene scores based on the sum of evidence for all availableASD-associated variants in a gene, with assessments based on mode of inheritance, effect size,and variant frequency in the general population. The approach was first presented in Mol Autism7:44 (2016), and scores for 461 genes can be found in column I in supplementary table 4 fromthat paper.
Zhang D Score

Score-0.2514913543757

Ranking16402/20870 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The DAMAGES score (disease-associated mutation analysis using gene expression signatures),or D score, was developed to combine evidence from de novo loss-of- function mutation withevidence from cell-type- specific gene expression in the mouse brain (specifically translationalprofiles of 24 specific mouse CNS cell types isolated from 6 different brain regions). Genes withpositive D scores are more likely to be associated with autism risk, with higher-confidence geneshaving higher D scores. This statistic was first presented by Zhang & Shen (Hum Mutat 38, 204-215 (2017), and D scores for more than 20,000 RefSeq genes can be found in column M insupplementary table 2 from that paper.
Interactome
Interaction Table
Interactor SymbolInteractor NameInteractor OrganismInteractor TypeEntrez IDUniprot ID
Sp5Sp5 transcription factorRatDNA Binding296510A0A0G2JUC1
Wnt10awingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 10ARatDNA Binding316527D3ZRW5
Zfp24zinc finger protein 24RatDNA Binding360204Q7TNK3
Submit New Gene

Report an Error

We care about your data, and we'd like to use cookies to give you a smooth browsing experience. Please agree and read more about ourprivacy policy.AGREE

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp