_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited.png)
TheWikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki Babel serves as a place where Wikimedia volunteers can discuss this site and alertadministrators as needed.
| Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki |
|---|
 |
Information |
Content |
Policies |
Wiki maintenance |
{{Foundation description}}, which is used on thehome page, is showing a wrong Wikipedia link on my browser under Chinese (Hong Kong) locale. It links me to:w:zh-hant:, which doesn't exist and should be:w:zh: instead. Other users using a language with variants may face the same problem.1F616EMO (talk)02:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
{{#switch:{{PAGELANGUAGE}} |zh-hans|zh-hant|zh-cn|zh-hk|zh-mo|zh-my|zh-sg|zh-tw = [[:w:zh:|{{int:Wikibase-sitelinks-wikipedia}}]] |#default = [[:w:{{int:lang}}:|{{int:Wikibase-sitelinks-wikipedia}}]] }}en, and onHome/zh, it is alwayszh. I think it would be correct to check against{{int:lang}}, where it emits variants such aszh-hant based on user preferences. That is, the code should be:[[:w:{{#switch:{{int:lang}}|en=|zh-hans|zh-hant|zh-cn|zh-hk|zh-mo|zh-my|zh-sg|zh-tw=zh:|#default={{int:lang}}:}}|{{int:Wikibase-sitelinks-wikipedia}}]]}}
Done Aha! Thank you. Now updated.A space is mysteriously missing here in translatable string no. 19,Policy:Wikimedia Foundation Office Actions Policy:
| Line 47: | Line 47: |
| <br /> | <br /> |
| <translate><!--T:19--> Global bans are considered a last resort and are only enforced upon receipt of complaint, investigation, extensive review and explicit approval by several Foundation staff members. As they prohibit all involvement in the Wikimedia projects, websites, platforms and activities from the moment they are enacted, by definition they also prohibit potentially positive future involvement of the banned individual, regardless of the outcome of that involvement. Knowingly facilitating the contributions of a globally banned individual, acting as a proxy for such a person, or attempting to interfere with Foundation staff or volunteer administrators, bureaucrats or functionaries enforcing a global ban in line with local policies may result in sanctions, including loss of advanced user rights or suspension of contributing access to Wikimedia sites.Since global bans are reserved for severe cases, their duration should typically be expected to be indefinite.</translate> | <translate><!--T:19--> Global bans are considered a last resort and are only enforced upon receipt of complaint, investigation, extensive review and explicit approval by several Foundation staff members. As they prohibit all involvement in the Wikimedia projects, websites, platforms and activities from the moment they are enacted, by definition they also prohibit potentially positive future involvement of the banned individual, regardless of the outcome of that involvement. Knowingly facilitating the contributions of a globally banned individual, acting as a proxy for such a person, or attempting to interfere with Foundation staff or volunteer administrators, bureaucrats or functionaries enforcing a global ban in line with local policies may result in sanctions, including loss of advanced user rights or suspension of contributing access to Wikimedia sites.Since global bans are reserved for severe cases, their duration should typically be expected to be indefinite.</translate> |
| <br /> | <br /> |
| </div> | </div> |
1F616EMO (talk)16:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Done - Fixed, thanks for the note here.Quiddity (WMF) (talk)23:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Can someone make a redirect on main namespace with something really short shortcuts, likeTAIV policy orTAIV (or something really shorter than current redirects) to there? I miss the time I could do this myself... :P — regards,Revi12:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I found a few translation documentation pages (qqq) written in Burmese. Added byZYX2233 probably by mistake in 2024. I suggest deleting them.
Samoasambia (talk)18:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Done - I've checked those and made sure they existed in the translated copy (one chunk transferred), and then deleted the mislocated duplicates. Thank you for mentioning.Quiddity (WMF) (talk)22:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Hi Wikipedia and Wikimedia content creators and readers, I wanted to create this topic discussion, asking about a modern and refreshing restyling of Wikipedia layout, which I think its too classic. Considering we are in 2026, I think Wikipedia needs a good modern layout, like other social or news apps. Thanks a lot for your attentionAndre il sommo (talk)11:17, 2 February 2026 (UTC)