Victoria’s Secret: What A Difference 30 Years Makes
CAN YOU GUESS which Victoria’s Secret models come from 1984 and which are from recent catalogs? I’ll give you a hint: the ones from 1984 resemble actual human females.
Here’s another clue: The new models look like someone accidentally left the Photoshop on all night. Every irregularity has been buffed away, to the point where their skin looks like CGI plastic.
Figured it out yet? This is by no means a knock on Victoria’s Secret. Their catalogs and models aren’t any different than any other high end fashion retailer. This is simply an often startling look at what a difference a few decades can make. I’ll leave it to you to be either impressed or depressed. I won’t hide where my biases lie; just ignore my snarky comments if you disagree – it’s all in fun.
This shows you what a geezer I am: I didn’t even know the frilly lingerie look wasover. Doing research for this article, I could barely find examples of the traditional frilly and ornate lace lingerie. When did this go away?
Another observation: Current VS models always have breasts of perfect dimensions with zero variability. 1984 boobs fluctuate wildly from model to model.
All pictures in this article have carbon based life forms (VS 1984) on the top or left, while silicon based life forms (New VS) are always pictured on the bottom or right.
In case you’re wondering, the new VS images are from 2012-13 catalogs. So, technically this article should be called “What a Difference Approximately 28 to 29 Years Plus or Minus a Few Months Makes”, but it didn’t have the same ring to it.
It’s almost cliché to say, but these 2012 ladies don’t look real. It’s like they’re made of synthetic resin from a 3-D printer.
I have no doubt the 2012 models are more fit and sculpted than their earlier counterparts. Plus, in ’84 the Victoria’s Secret franchise wasn’t the big league modelling gig it is today. Thus, your candidates weren’t the cream of the crop.
This all may be true, but it still doesn’t explain the artificiality. We used to call it “airbrushing”, but that was nothing compared to the belligerent computer enhanced rendering that takes place today.
I have to admit, the 2012 models look like they’re having a lot more fun. The ’84 babes look like they’ve been tranquilized.
That being said, since the take home message l get from the 2012 photos is “computer enhanced fakery”, I can’t believe or buy into the “fun”.
In a world where every image we encounter is digitally modified, why should Victoria’s Secret be any different? We’ve become accustomed to the synthetic touched-up look of models. If VS got a wild hair up their ass and decided to go back to basics and usereal film with no touch-ups, modern consumers would probably experience mini-seizures. It would not compute. VS would have the satisfaction of using real human models while filing for bankruptcy.
END
Would you like to support Flashbak?
Please consider making adonation to our site. We don't want to rely on ads to bring you the best of visual culture. You can also support us by signing up to ourMailing List. And you can also follow us onFacebook,Instagram andTwitter. For great art and culture delivered to your door,visit our shop.
VISIT OUR SHOP
Visit the shopEditor’s picks
Photographs of The Romanovs’ Final Ball In Color, St Petersburg, Russia 1903
These portrait photographs of Russia's ruling Romanovs were taken in 1903 at the Winter Palace in majestic. St. Petersburg. Knowing what was to follow, the venue was apposite. St Petersburg is the city Christopher Hitchens called "an apparent temple of civilization: the polished window between Russia and Europe... the ...0Post Views:571,199Photographer Updates Postcards Of 1960s Resorts Into Their Abandoned Ruins
Ephemeral, disposable, they served only one purpose—to let someone know "I'm here. I'm thinking of you" - Pablo Iglesias Maurer ...0Post Views:667,524The Death of Cass Elliot and Keith Moon at Harry Nilsson’s Macabre Mayfair Flat
Cass Elliot died choking on a ham sandwich; everybody knows that. Except that she didn’t. ...0Post Views:52,279Jesus Amongst the Fans: The Naked Hippie Dancer
It was a Saturday evening, St Valentine’s Day 1970, when William Jellett first thought he might be Jesus. He was on the London Underground, travelling back from work, and noticed the headline of the newspaper unfurled opposite him: “Cambridge riots — two policemen beaten up”. There had been student protests the ...0Post Views:14,664The LSD Archive at The Institute of Illegal Images
“It kept me from eating it if it was framed on the wall” - Mark Mcloud on his amazing collection of LSD Blotters ...0Post Views:24,982‘Teenage Historian’ Chuck Berry Reviews The Clash, Talking Heads, Joy Division And The Sex Pistols For A 1980 Punk Zine
In 1980, Chuck Berry spoke to St Louis-based punk zine Jet Lag (1980 -1991). Berry talked about his first gig, signing with Leonard Chess's Chess Records, his role as a "teenage historian" and "what the kids are listening to these days". He was invited to review some records. Chuck Berry's record ...0Post Views:8,679New York City Squatters In The 1990s
"I humbly invite you to take a stroll through my life in the squatter community of the Lower East Side (LES) in the 1990s," writes Ash Thayer, whose book, Kill City, focuses on New York City squatters, harking back to another age, when city's were not being made overly safe, libraries were valued ...0Post Views:10,445The First Naked Kiss On Camera: Eadweard Muybridge, Sex And Murder
Eadweard Muybridge (9 April 1830 – 8 May 1904) was not into smut and eroticism. His rapid-fire sequential photographs of two naked women kissing served to aid his studies of human and animal movement. It was in the interests of art and science Muybridge secured the services of two women, ...0Post Views:478,51210% Off – JUST SIGN-UP FOR FREE: