Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


H1 Connect

Connecting the world to the rightdoctors

This page is archived

Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation.

Quah HM et al.

Cancer. 2008 Jul 01; 113(1):57-64

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23516PMID:18442099

Classifications

  • Confirmation
  • Interesting Hypothesis

Evaluations

Good
21 Jul 2008

This article reinforces the thought that the final pathologic stage is the best predictor of disease-free survival for patients with rectal cancer. It has also revealed that tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy may play a role in prognosis.Rectal cancer affects >40,000 Americans annually. As we know, therapy is dictated by the extent of the disease on presentation defined by the TNM staging classification of malignant tumours. The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is a combination of chemoradiation and surgery.Through a prospectively maintained database of patients preoperatively staged with endorectal ultasound (ERUS) at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 342 patients with advanced primary rectal cancer staged as T3/4 and/or N1/2 were identified. The purpose was to identify the staging elements and treatment-related variables that most reliably prognosticate disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. All patients underwent the appropriate surgical resection. They were then followed every three to four months for two years, and then every six to twelve months thereafter. Various staging elements were examined to determine their reliability in predicting outcome. Postoperative pathology (T and N classification) was found to be the best predictor of outcome with a concordance index of 0.75. It was also found that clinical staging adds no predictive value to the pathologic staging model. Interestingly, this study showed a predictive role for the histological response to preoperative chemoradiation; however, it was not equal to the pathologic staging. Over time, the response to neoadjuvant therapy may be incorporated into staging systems if a way for standardization is found. However, it currently remains the standard of care to treat patients according to their preoperative clinical stage and use the postoperative pathologic stage to help determine the patient's prognosis.

Good
06 Aug 2008

The final pathologic stage in the evaluation of rectal cancer prognosis is, without any doubt, as fundamental as tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment. We use these data in our clinic, both in the preoperative and in postoperative setting, for evaluating prognosis. This study examined the role of final pathologic stage as a prognostic factor, comparing it to other variable elements from a prospectively maintained single-institution database. At the Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 342 consecutive patients with advanced rectal cancer staged by EUS as T3 and T4 with N1/N2 were selected. The degree of tumor regression was histologically graded. The final pathological T and N classifications were demonstrated by the analysis to be most predictive of disease-free survival. In addition, tumor response to preoperative therapy was shown to remain a strong predictor.The study confirms a very common opinion regarding the main prognostic factors in the evaluation of disease-free survival following a combined standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

1 of 2

Relevant Specialties

  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology

    Gastrointestinal Cancers |Gastrointestinal Tract
  • Oncology

    Gastrointestinal Cancers

Clinical Trials

1 of 0

Related Articles

Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial.

Aschele C et al.2011 Jul 10
Latest recommendation by:
18 Aug 2011
  • New Finding

Optimal timing of surgery after chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results of a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II prospective trial.

Garcia-Aguilar J et al.2011 Jul
Latest recommendation by:
  • New Finding

Phase 2 study of preoperative radiation with concurrent capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by surgery and postoperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: ECOG 3204.

Landry JC et al.2013 Apr 15
Latest recommendation by:

    Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

    Kalady MF et al.2009 Oct
    Latest recommendation by:
    14 Oct 2009
    • New Finding

    Patient-Derived Organoids Predict Chemoradiation Responses of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

    Yao Y et al.2020 01 02
    Latest recommendation by:
    03 Dec 2019
    • Confirmation

    Pre-operative chemoradiation for non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer.

    McCarthy K et al.2012 Dec 12
    Latest recommendation by:

      Distribution of residual cancer cells in the bowel wall after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.

      Duldulao MP et al.2013 Feb
      Latest recommendation by:

        PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair-Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

        Cercek A et al.2022 Jun 23
        Latest recommendation by:
        13 Jan 2023
        • New Finding

        Findings on 18F-FDG PET scans after neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides prognostic stratification in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma subsequently treated by radical surgery.

        Kalff V et al.2006 Jan
        Latest recommendation by:
        12 Apr 2006
        • New Finding
        • Clinical Trial: Non-RCT

        Chromosomal copy number alterations are associated with persistent lymph node metastasis after chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

        Chen Z et al.2012 Jun
        Latest recommendation by:
          1 of 10

          [8]ページ先頭

          ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp