1. Claude Panaccio:Late Medieval Nominalism and Non-Veridical Concepts(provides a detailed critique of a central argument of myJohn Buridan), and here is my reply:Demon Skepticism and Non-Veridical Concepts, read at the 2009 APA convention in NYC 2. Buridan on Substantial Unity and Substantial Concepts, comments on Henrik Lagerlund:John Buridan's Empiricism and the Knowledge of Substances, read at the UWO Colloquium, October 9, 2009 3. "Intentional Transfer in Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the Representationalism of Aquinas" comments on Richard Taylor’s and Max Herrera’s papers 4. "Putting Skeptics in Their Place vs. Stopping Them in Their Tracks",comments byGiorgio Pini andJohn Greco, and myreplies 5. Replyto Tony Roark onTarski and Klima: Conceptual Closure in Anselm’s Proof 6. Contemporary 'Essentialism' vs. Aristotelian Essentialism 7. Comments on Klima, Contemporary "Essentialism" vs. Aristotelian Essentialism,by Michael Kremer 8. Reply to Michael Kremer 9. Nulla virtus cognoscitiva circa proprium obiectum decipiturcomments on Robert Pasnau:The Identity of the Knower and the Known 10. Review of Anthony Kenny: Aquinas on Mind 11. Commentson Peter King: "The Failure of Ockham’s Nominalism" 12. "Is Ockhamoff the hook?" 13. Reply to David Burrell'scomments on "Man = Body + Soul: Aquinas's Arithmetic of Human Nature" 14. "What can a scholastic do in the 21st century?" 15. Commentson Jack Zupko: "Philosophy Among the Artistae: A Late-Medieval Picture of the Limits of Rational Inquiry" 16. "Semantic Complexity and Syntactic Simplicity in Ockham's Mental Language"comments on Yiwei Zheng:"Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination" |