FromMiddle Dutchwerden, fromOld Dutchwerthan, fromProto-West Germanic*werþan, fromProto-Germanic*werþaną, fromProto-Indo-European*wert-.
worden
| Conjugation ofworden (strong class 3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| infinitive | worden | |||
| past singular | werd | |||
| past participle | geworden | |||
| infinitive | worden | |||
| gerund | wordenn | |||
| present tense | past tense | |||
| 1st person singular | word | werd | ||
| 2nd person sing. (jij) | wordt,word2 | werd | ||
| 2nd person sing. (u) | wordt | werd | ||
| 2nd person sing. (gij) | wordt | werdt | ||
| 3rd person singular | wordt | werd | ||
| plural | worden | werden | ||
| subjunctive sing.1 | worde | werde | ||
| subjunctive plur.1 | worden | werden | ||
| imperative sing. | word | |||
| imperative plur.1 | wordt | |||
| participles | wordend | geworden | ||
| 1)Archaic.2) In case ofinversion. | ||||
The prefixge- was originally a marker of theperfective aspect. As such it was principally not added to verbs likewerden that were by definition (mostly) perfective. (Remnants of this distinction are still found in dialects; compareLuxembourgishbruecht,fonnt,komm.) In modern German, all verbs with initial stress take the prefixge-. The exception ofworden haseuphonic reasons, because as an auxiliary it is always combined with another past participle. This distinction betweengeworden (full verb) andworden (auxiliary) fully established itself only during the 19th century, however.
worden
worden
Fromword +-en(infinitival suffix).
worden
1 Sometimes used as a formal 2nd-person singular.
worden
worden