{{term}}. Each reader can override the default usingWT:PREFS orWT:CUSTOM.
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/style for mentioned terms: straw poll with weak support for italic mentionsWiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style: vote chose bold as the default style for mentions in “form of” definitions draft policyWiktionary:Etymology: As of2007-June-21, it suggested italics for Latin script mentions in etymologies.WT:BP#Consistent format for mentioned termsTemplate talk:term
Support — [ric |opiaterein ] —01:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC) if we're going to have a default, I think this should be bold, because after all, it's important and should be noticeable.[reply]SupportDAVilla03:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportEncycloPetey15:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportVisviva00:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Let's do this thing.[reply]SupportDCDuring01:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC) No objection[reply]SupportCirceus01:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC) I like it.[reply]SupportConnel MacKenzie01:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportDAVilla 03:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC) My strong preferance, but either will do.DAVilla03:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]Support\Mike08:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportWilliamsayers7907:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportTohru03:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]Support— Beobach97203:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]SupportH.(talk)18:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC) Following long-standing typographic traditions.[reply]Support.bd2412T17:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]Support —SaltmarshTalk08:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]Support — As has already been pointed out, this is the convention in lexicography. —Paul G08:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]Support15:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AbstainWidsith10:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Don't really mind: quite like both.[reply]