Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk)20:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

On the topic of the German translation of "wherefore," what about "wovor," which when you break it into its component parts has the meaning of "where" and "fore?" It also has the greater meaning of "for what," or "because of what." Just a thought.— Thisunsigned comment was added by66.207.67.33 (talk).

Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk)20:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

An extended discussion onhttp://www.enotes.com/shakespeare-quotes/o-romeo-romeo-wherefore-art-thou-romeo suggests assuming "wherefore == why" to be at best incomplete. Maybe it has merit and the definition would gain from being revised ?

Thanks for the reference!

The distinction the source makes is between “why = from whatcause (past)” vs. “why = for whatpurpose (future)”, and argue that in this context, it is better interpreted as “for what purpose” [Why do you go on being a Montague you fool!] which is an interesting point to make.

However, I am not convinced by the interpretation – rather than a genuine question, it sounds like a rhetorical wailing “Oh why oh why is the world the way it is?” – compare “why did my dog have to get run over?” While one could gloss this (“for what cosmic purpose do bad things happen”, that seems excessive.

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk)20:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion has been moved fromWiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Rfv-sense - verb. Can anyone understand the definition?SemperBlotto22:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy delete. It seems like tosh, and the putative quotation is by an author whose name doesn't get even one Google-hit. —Ruakh_TALK22:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedily deleted,WT:BJAODN seems to be the place for this.Mglovesfun (talk)12:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The second example starts a paragraph or even text, so what is this conjunction referring back to? --Backinstadiums (talk)17:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

• RFV result
• RFV result (archived)