Talk:re
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Text deleted from Lojban: The cardinality of the set {0,1};one plus one. The number of eyes that a typical human has. Represented in Roman numerals as II and in Arabic numerals as 2.
The use ofre as a preposition seems to me very uncommon, butre: andRe: abbreviations of course are everywhere. Should it be listed as an abbreviation separately? Also, as an abbreviation, it is something of an anomaly; it is neverre. instead onlyre: exists in the wild. What's the best way to describe that? --Connel MacKenzie 20:47, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Greek interjections do not belong here. Greek interjections should be written in the Greek alphabet.Uncle G18:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
The following information has failedWiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meetsWiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: reinsurance. This is in OED, but the only cites are the use of "Re" (with capital) in the names of publications or businesses. Can this be found in running text? If not I'd argue it isn't a word and/or should be moved toRe.This, that and the other (talk)08:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failedThis, that and the other (talk)05:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply