The following information has failedWiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meetsWiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

UK sense just added by anon, slang for "sex." --WikiPedant00:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd assume this is related to the expression "sowing own's oats" (or "wild oats", etc.). I'm not sure it has this meaning outside of the expression. --EncycloPetey02:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Total agreement - sense should be removed.SemperBlotto07:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleted.Equinox◑19:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cognate withWest Frisian OAT[8] ,Dutch OOT[8] -Dutch regional (West Flemish) ATE, OTE , (Zeeland) ŌTŌ , ŌŌTE, all in sense (‘wild oat’): (O.E.D); andFrisian OAT<English OAT; all of which, however, may be borrowed fromEnglish. There may be a possibility of a pre-Germanic origin[3], but with a similar sense[7]. Compare alsoEstonian OAD[4] (broad bean). Not to be connected withWelsh andBreton ĪD[2] (corn), (unless related to ScotsGaelic AD[3]); nor withIcelandic ÆTI[3], (an eatable). Dr. Skeat comparesNorwegian EITEL[6], (a gland, knot, nodule);Icelandic EITILL[6], (nodule in stone);Russian IADRO[5], (kernel, ball); and lastly, but not least:Greek ṎIDOS[7], (swelling); mostly fromProto-Indo-European or earlier root *EID[6]. This root and that of the Estonian OAD (broad bean) ultimately answer to pre-historic √2Dh2R (ADhAR){11th February 2019} (to be wide, swell)[6]. Andrew H. Gray 10:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Andrew (talk) It must be understood that fossil vocabulary is still possible in the Nordic areas due to the proximity to Lapland whose dialects once covered Scandinavia. Therefore the presence of apparent related semanitics is not sufficient basis to assume a Germanic origin. Amended: Andrew H. Gray12:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Andrew (talk)Reply

[0] means 'Absolutely not; [1] means 'Exceedingly unlikely'; [2] means 'Very dubious'; [3] means 'Questionable'; [4] means 'Possible'; [5] means 'Probable'; [6] means 'Likely'; [7] means 'Most Likely' or *Unattested; [8] means 'Attested'; [9] means 'Obvious' - only used for close matches within the same language or dialect, at linkable periods.  '2' stands for thelaryngeal that takes the place of the 'ā' and 'a' that are missing. √ means original or earliest root.

Look at the Old Turkish word OT. It means simply grass. The Uygur dialect calls it OOT, and this is in form and meaning the same like OAT. Isn't it?A word with an uncertain etymology could be explained like that, maybe.--UzunbacakAdem (talk)13:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

That is a "cool" etymology. I can only suggest that you sign up for Academia and if you are so inclined to subscribe to the Premium stage (that I cannot do, since I have no online payment facilities) and download the papers on "GERMANIC SUBSTRATES", because I cannot find any for OAT. There needs to be cognates in Welsh or Cornish, or from another Celtic dialect in Britain in order to link such a lexeme with a totally different language family as inTurkic; but there could be a remote connection in Bronze Age times with Welsh ĪD (corn) and ĀD in Gaelic. Any substrate link would have to be Pre-Celtic and the suggested semantic roots in the main entry page and that of mine (above) would be quite irrelevant. Andrew H. Gray 17:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Andrew (talk)

• RFV result
• RFV result (failed)